Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
European Commission v Éditions Odile Jacob SAS (C-404/10 P)
Judgment
The appeal
Findings of the Court
110

European Commission v Éditions Odile Jacob SAS (C-404/10 P)

Judgment of 28 Jun 2012law://eu/cjeu/2010/c-404-10/para_110@2026-11-12

110Those regulations do not contain a provision expressly giving one regulation primacy over the other. Accordingly, it is appropriate to ensure that each of those regulations is applied in a manner compatible with the other and which enables a coherent application of them.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Third Chamber
Case: C-404/10 P · ECLI:EU:C:2012:393
Decided: 28 Jun 2012
Procedure: Appeal
Applicant: European Commission
Defendants: Czech Republic; French Republic
Rapporteur: E. Juhász
Advocate General: J. Mazák
Bench: 5 judges
K. Lenaerts, J. Malenovský, R. Silva de Lapuerta, E. Juhász, G. Arestis
Language: French
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62010CJ0404

Topics

Access to documents

History · 1 version

28 Jun 2012Reading

Connections

Cited by 23: Novis Insurance Company, Novis Versicherungsgesellschaft, Novis Compagnia di Assicurazioni, Novis Poisťovňa a.s. v European Commission (T-185/24); SD v European Medicines Agency (T-623/22)2 provisions; MeSoFa Vermögensverwaltungs AG, anciennement Sber Vermögensverwaltungs AG v Single Resolution Board (T-291/23); Martijn Frederik Nouwen v Council of the European Union (T-255/24); Huhtamaki Holding Sàrl v European Commission (T-225/24); Lisa Ballmann v European Data Protection Board (T-183/23)2 provisions; Milan Zver v European Commission (T-235/24); TotalEnergies Marketing Nederland NV v European Commission (T-332/22); Fabien Courtois and Others v European Commission (T-761/21); Roberto Acampora and Others v European Commission (T-261/23); Veneziana Energia Risorse Idriche Territorio Ambiente Servizi SpA (Veritas) v European Commission (T-602/22); Michele Vendrame v European Commission (T-379/21); Eurecna SpA v European Commission (T-377/21); International Management Group (IMG) v European Commission (T-752/20); Satabank plc v European Central Bank (T-72/20); Tazzetti SpA and Tazzetti, SA v European Commission (T-825/19); Hans-Wilhelm Saure v European Commission (T-524/21); Ondřej Múka v European Commission (T-214/21); Hans-Wilhelm Saure v European Commission (T-651/21); Francesca Corneli v European Central Bank (T-501/19); Huhtamaki Sàrl v European Commission (T-134/20); JP v European Commission (T-247/20); TUIfly GmbH v European Commission (T-619/18)
Cites 7: Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents; European Commission v The Bavarian Lager Co. Ltd (C-28/08 P); Commission Regulation (EC) No 802/2004 of 7 April 2004 implementing Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 on the control of concentrations between undertakings (Text with EEA relevance); Commission Regulation (EC) No 447/98 of 1 March 1998 on the notifications, time limits and hearings provided for in Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89 on the control of concentrations between undertakings (Text with EEA relevance); European Commission v Technische Glaswerke Ilmenau GmbH (C-139/07 P); Kingdom of Sweden v Association de la presse internationale ASBL (API) and European Commission, Association de la presse internationale ASBL (API) v European Commission and European Commission v Association de la presse internationale ASBL (API) (C-514/07 P, C-528/07 P, C-532/07 P); Kingdom of Sweden v European Commission and MyTravel Group plc (C-506/08 P)