Oliver Brüstle v Greenpeace eV (C-34/10)

Judgment of 18 Oct 2011

law://eu/cjeu/2010/c-34-10/para_25@2026-11-12

25It must be borne in mind that, according to settled case-law, the need for a uniform application of European Union law and the principle of equality require that the terms of a provision of European Union law which makes no express reference to the law of the Member States for the purpose of determining its meaning and scope must normally be given an independent and uniform interpretation throughout the European Union (see, in particular, Case 327/82 Ekro [1984] ECR 107, paragraph 11; Case C-287/98 Linster [2000] ECR I-6917, paragraph 43; Case C-5/08 Infopaq International [2009] ECR I-6569, paragraph 27; and Case C-467/08 Padawan [2010] ECR I-10055, paragraph 32).

Oliver Brüstle v Greenpeace eV (C-34/10)

History · 1 version

Key facts

Connections