Judgment_paragraph 33 · Hypoteční banka a.s. v Udo Mike Lindner (C-327/10)

33In a situation such as that in the main proceedings, the courts of the Member State of which the defendant is a national may also consider themselves to have jurisdiction even though the place in that Member State where the defendant is domiciled is unknown. In those circumstances, application of the uniform rules of jurisdiction laid down by Regulation No 44/2001 to replace those in force in the various Member States would be in accordance with the requirement of legal certainty and with the purpose of that regulation, which is to guarantee, to the greatest extent possible, the protection of defendants who are domiciled in the European Union.

Hypoteční banka a.s. v Udo Mike Lindner (C-327/10)

History · 1 version

Key facts

Connections