Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Maribel Dominguez v Centre informatique du Centre Ouest Atlantique and Préfet de la région Centre (C-282/10)
Judgment
The dispute in the main proceedings an…
The second question
40

Maribel Dominguez v Centre informatique du Centre Ouest Atlantique and Préfet de la région Centre (C-282/10)

Judgment of 24 Jan 2012law://eu/cjeu/2010/c-282-10/para_40@2026-11-12

40It is therefore for the national court to determine whether Article 7(1) of Directive 2003/88 may be relied upon against the CICOA.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Grand Chamber
Case: C-282/10 · ECLI:EU:C:2012:33
Decided: 24 Jan 2012
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the Cour de cassation (France)
Applicant: Maribel Dominguez
Defendants: Centre informatique du Centre Ouest Atlantique; Préfet de la région Centre
Rapporteur: E. Levits
Advocate General: V. Trstenjak
Bench: 11 judges
V. Skouris, A. Tizzano, J.N. Cunha Rodrigues, K. Lenaerts, U. Lõhmus, A. Rosas, E. Levits, A. Ó Caoimh, L. Bay Larsen, T. von Danwitz, A. Arabadjiev
Language: French
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62010CJ0282

Topics

History · 1 version

24 Jan 2012Reading

Connections

Interprets 2: Directive 2003/88/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 November 2003 concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time; Andrea Francovich and Danila Bonifaci and others v Italian Republic (C-6/90, C-9/90)
Cited by 24: LH v Profi Credit Slovakia s.r.o (C-485/19); Criminal proceedings against Daniel Adam Popławski (C-573/17); Max-Planck-Gesellschaft zur Förderung der Wissenschaften eV v Tetsuji Shimizu (C-684/16); Entoma SAS v Ministre de l’Économie et des Finances and Ministre de l'Agriculture et de l'Alimentation (C-526/19); Terveys- ja sosiaalialan neuvottelujärjestö (TSN) ry v Hyvinvointialan liitto ry and Auto- ja Kuljetusalan Työntekijäliitto AKT ry v Satamaoperaattorit ry (C-609/17, C-610/17); Société de perception et de distribution des droits des artistes-interprètes de la musique et de la danse (Spedidam) and Others v Institut national de l’audiovisuel (C-484/18); Stadt Wuppertal v Maria Elisabeth Bauer and Volker Willmeroth v Martina Broßonn (C-569/16, C-570/16); OPR-Finance s.r.o. v GK (C-679/18); Torsten Hein v Albert Holzkamm GmbH & Co (C-385/17); VB v Glavna direktsia 'Pozharna bezopasnost i zashtita na naselenieto' (C-262/20); Skarb Państwa - Dyrektor Okręgowego Urzędu Miar w K. v Z. sp.j (C-279/23); YH v European Central Bank (T-366/23); Makeleio EPE and Zougla G.R. AE v Ethniko Symvoulio Radiotileorasis (ESR) (C-555/23); Obshtina Svishtov v Rakovoditel na Upravlyavashtia organ na Operativna programa „Regioni v rastezh“ 2014-2020 (C-175/23); Belgische Staat/Federale Overheidsdienst Financiën v L BV (C-243/23); BAWAG PSK Bank für Arbeit und Wirtschaft und Österreichische Postsparkasse AG v European Central Bank (T-667/21); Sber Vermögensverwaltungs AG, formerly Sberbank Europe AG v European Central Bank (T-647/21); Francesca Corneli v European Central Bank (T-502/19); QH v Varhoven kasatsionen sad na Republika Bulgaria and CV v Iccrea Banca SpA (C-762/18, C-37/19); Frank Steinhoff and Others v European Central Bank (T-107/17); Ahmad Shah Ayubi v Bezirkshauptmannschaft Linz-Land (C-713/17); Sebastian W. Kreuziger v Land Berlin (C-619/16); Ministerul Justiţiei and Tribunalul Botoşani v Maria Dicu (C-12/17); David Smith v Patrick Meade and Others (C-122/17)2 provisions
Cites 19: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016); Directive 2003/88/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 November 2003 concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time; Bernhard Pfeiffer, Wilhelm Roith, Albert Süß, Michael Winter, Klaus Nestvogel, Roswitha Zeller and Matthias Döbele v Deutsches Rotes Kreuz, Kreisverband Waldshut eV (C-397/01, C-398/01, C-399/01, C-400/01, C-401/01, C-402/01, C-403/01); Andrea Francovich and Danila Bonifaci and others v Italian Republic (C-6/90, C-9/90); Kiriaki Angelidaki and Others v Organismos Nomarchiakis Autodioikisis Rethymnis, Charikleia Giannoudi v Dimos Geropotamou and Georgios Karabousanos and Sofoklis Michopoulos v Dimos Geropotamou (C-378/07); A. Foster and others v British Gas plc (C-188/89); Paola Faccini Dori v Recreb Srl (C-91/92); Impact v Minister for Agriculture and Food and Others (C-268/06); M. H. Marshall v Southampton and South-West Hampshire Area Health Authority (Teaching) (152/84); El Corte Inglés SA v Cristina Blázquez Rivero (C-192/94); Council Directive 93/104/EC of 23 November 1993 concerning certain aspects of the organization of working time; KHS AG v Winfried Schulte (C-214/10); Gerhard Schultz-Hoff v Deutsche Rentenversicherung Bund and Stringer and Others v Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs (C-350/06); The Queen v Secretary of State for Trade and Industry, ex parte Broadcasting, Entertainment, Cinematographic and Theatre Union (BECTU) (C-173/99); Maribel Dominguez v Centre informatique du Centre Ouest Atlantique and Préfet de la région Centre (C-282/10); Elaine Farrell v Alan Whitty, Minister for the Environment, Ireland, Attorney General and Motor Insurers Bureau of Ireland (MIBI) (C-356/05); Renato Collino and Luisella Chiappero v Telecom Italia SpA (C-343/98); Seda Kücükdeveci v Swedex GmbH & Co. KG (C-555/07); Konstantinos Adeneler and Others v Ellinikos Organismos Galaktos (ELOG) (C-212/04)