Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Missionswerk Werner Heukelbach eV v Belgian State (C-25/10)
Judgment
Consideration of the question referred
Identification of the relevant provisi…
19

Missionswerk Werner Heukelbach eV v Belgian State (C-25/10)

law://eu/cjeu/2010/c-25-10/para_19@2026-11-12

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Second Chamber
Case: C-25/10 · ECLI:EU:C:2011:65
Decided: 10 Feb 2011
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the Tribunal de première instance de Liège (Belgium)
Applicant: Missionswerk Werner Heukelbach eV
Defendant: État belge
Rapporteur: U. Lõhmus
Advocate General: N. Jääskinen
Bench: 5 judges
J.N. Cunha Rodrigues, A. Arabadjiev, U. Lõhmus, A. Ó Caoimh, P. Lindh
Language: French
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62010CJ0025

Topics

Non-discrimination on grounds of nationality

History · 1 version

10 Feb 2011Reading

Judgment of 10 Feb 2011

19Accordingly, since the provisions on the free movement of capital are applicable and provide specific rules on non-discrimination, Article 18 TFEU does not apply.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Connections

Interprets 1: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)2 provisions
Cited by 10: ‘Toplofikatsia Sofia’ EAD (C-222/23); Benjámin Dávid Nagy v Vas Megyei Rendőr-főkapitányság (C-583/14)2 provisions; European Commission v Hellenic Republic (C-98/16); European Commission v Hellenic Republic (C-244/15); European Commission v French Republic (C-485/14); Finanzamt Ulm v Ingeborg Wagner-Raith (C-560/13); Yvon Welte v Finanzamt Velbert (C-181/12)2 provisions; Marianne Scheunemann v Finanzamt Bremerhaven (C-31/11)2 provisions; Staatssecretaris van Financiën v L.A.C. van Putten and Others (C-578/10, C-579/10, C-580/10)2 provisions; Ulrich Schröder v Finanzamt Hameln (C-450/09)2 provisions
Cites 14: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)8 provisions; Glaxo Wellcome GmbH & Co. KG v Finanzamt München II (C-182/08); Council Directive 88/361/EEC of 24 June 1988 for the implementation of Article 67 of the Treaty; Vera Mattner v Finanzamt Velbert (C-510/08); Société de Gestion Industrielle (SGI) v Belgian State (C-311/08); Centro di Musicologia Walter Stauffer v Finanzamt München für Körperschaften (C-386/04); J. E. J. Blanckaert v Inspecteur van de Belastingdienst/Particulieren/Ondernemingen buitenland te Heerlen (C-512/03); Staatssecretaris van Financiën v B.G.M. Verkooijen (C-35/98); Hein Persche v Finanzamt Lüdenscheid (C-318/07); D. M. M. A. Arens-Sikken v Staatssecretaris van Financiën (C-43/07); Hans Eckelkamp and Others v Belgische Staat (C-11/07); Ingrid Schmelz v Finanzamt Waldviertel (C-97/09); Petri Manninen (C-319/02); Heirs of M. E. A. van Hilten-van der Heijden v Inspecteur van de Belastingdienst/Particulieren/Ondernemingen buitenland te Heerlen (C-513/03)