Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

European Union
Brosmann Footwear (HK) Ltd and Others v Council of the European Union (C-249/10 P)
Judgment
The appeal
The grounds of appeal alleging errors…
Findings of the Court
36

Brosmann Footwear (HK) Ltd and Others v Council of the European Union (C-249/10 P)

law://eu/cjeu/2010/c-249-10/para_36@2026-11-14

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Third Chamber
Case: C-249/10 P · ECLI:EU:C:2012:53
Decided: 2 Feb 2012
Procedure: Action for annulment
Ruled invalid: 62006TJ0401
Applicants: Brosmann Footwear (HK) Ltd; Seasonable Footwear (Zhongshan) Ltd; Lung Pao Footwear (Guangzhou) Ltd; Risen Footwear (HK) Co. Ltd
Defendant: Council of the European Union
Rapporteur: G. Arestis
Advocate General: P. Mengozzi
Bench: 5 judges
K. Lenaerts, J. Malenovský, R. Silva de Lapuerta, G. Arestis, D. Šváby
Language: English
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62010CJ0249

Topics

History · 1 version

2 Feb 2012Reading

Judgment of 2 Feb 2012

36However, the General Court erred in law in so far as it held that the Commission was not required to examine MET claims under Article 2(7)(b) and (c) of the basic regulation from non-sampled traders.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Connections

Interprets 1: Brosmann Footwear (HK) Ltd and Others v Council of the European Union (T-401/06)
Cited by 13: T.KUP SAS v Belgische Staat (C-349/16)2 provisions; Puma SE and Others v European Commission (C-507/21); Changmao Biochemical Engineering Co. Ltd v European Commission (C-666/19 P); European Commission and GMB Glasmanufaktur Brandenburg GmbH v Xinyi PV Products (Anhui) Holdings Ltd (C-884/19 P); Roland SE v European Commission (T-132/18); Canadian Solar Emea GmbH and Others v Council of the European Union (C-236/17 P)2 provisions; Yingli Energy (China) Co. Ltd and Others v Council of the European Union (T-160/14); Canadian Solar Emea GmbH and Others v Council of the European Union (T-162/14); JingAo Solar Co. Ltd and Others v Council of the European Union (T-157/14); Wortmann KG Internationale Schuhproduktionen v Hauptzollamt Bielefeld (C-365/15)4 provisions; Jinan Meide Casting Co. Ltd v Council of the European Union (T-424/13)2 provisions; Xinyi PV Products (Anhui) Holdings Ltd v European Commission (T-586/14)2 provisions; C & J Clark International Ltd v The Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue & Customs and Puma SE v Hauptzollamt Nürnberg (C-659/13, C-34/14)6 provisions
Cites 5: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016); Council Regulation (EC) No 461/2004 of 8 March 2004 amending Regulation (EC) No 384/96 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community and Regulation (EC) No 2026/97 on protection against subsidised imports from countries not members of the European Community; Council Regulation (EC) No 1472/2006 of 5 October 2006 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitely the provisional duty imposed on imports of certain footwear with uppers of leather originating in the People's Republic of China and Vietnam; Brosmann Footwear (HK) Ltd and Others v Council of the European Union (T-401/06); Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of 22 December 1995 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community