Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Bureau d'intervention et de restitution belge v Beneo-Orafti SA (C-150/10)
Judgment
Consideration of the questions referred
The first part of the fourth question…
77

Bureau d'intervention et de restitution belge v Beneo-Orafti SA (C-150/10)

Judgment of 21 Jul 2011law://eu/cjeu/2010/c-150-10/para_77@2026-11-12

77What must be ascertained is therefore not whether the measure adopted by the legislature was the only measure possible or the best measure possible but whether it was manifestly inappropriate (Agrana Zucker, paragraph 33).

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Fourth Chamber
Case: C-150/10 · ECLI:EU:C:2011:507
Decided: 21 Jul 2011
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the Tribunal de première instance de Bruxelles (Belgium)
Applicant: Bureau d’intervention et de restitution belge
Defendant: Beneo-Orafti SA
Rapporteur: A. Prechal
Advocate General: Y. Bot
Bench: 5 judges
J.-C. Bonichot, K. Schiemann, C. Toader, A. Prechal, E. Jarašiūnas
Language: French
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62010CJ0150

Topics

Common organisation of the markets

History · 1 version

21 Jul 2011Reading

Connections

Interprets 3: Council Regulation (EC) No 318/2006 of 20 February 2006 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector; Council Regulation (EC) No 320/2006 of 20 February 2006 establishing a temporary scheme for the restructuring of the sugar industry in the Community and amending Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005 on the financing of the common agricultural policy; Commission Regulation (EC) No 968/2006 of 27 June 2006 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 320/2006 establishing a temporary scheme for the restructuring of the sugar industry in the Community
Cited by 9: Mowi ASA v European Commission (C-10/18 P)2 provisions; Republic of Slovenia v European Commission (T-626/17)2 provisions; Marine Harvest ASA v European Commission (T-704/14)3 provisions; Giand Srl v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (T-583/14); TVR Automotive Ltd v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (T-398/13)2 provisions; SFIR — Società Fondiaria Industriale Romagnola SpA v AGEA — Agenzia per le Erogazioni in Agricoltura and Ministero delle Politiche agricole, alimentari e forestali Italia Zuccheri SpA and Co.Pro.B. — Cooperativa Produttori Bieticoli Soc. coop. Agricola v AGEA — Agenzia per le Erogazioni in Agricoltura and Ministero delle Politiche agricole, alimentari e forestali and Eridania Sadam SpA v AGEA — Agenzia per le Erogazioni in Agricoltura and Ministero delle Politiche agricole, alimentari e forestali (C-187/12, C-188/12, C-189/12)2 provisions; Etablissement national des produits de l’agriculture et de la mer (FranceAgriMer) v Vinifrance SA (C-670/11)2 provisions; Maatschap L. A. en D. A. B. Langestraat en P. Langestraat-Troost v Staatssecretaris van Economische Zaken, Landbouw en Innovatie (C-11/12)2 provisions; ED et F Man Alcohols v Office national interprofessionnel des fruits, des légumes, des vins et de l'horticulture (Viniflhor) (C-669/11)
Cites 13: Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (consolidated 2016); Commission Regulation (EC) No 967/2006 of 29 June 2006 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 318/2006 as regards sugar production in excess of the quota; Council Regulation (EC) No 318/2006 of 20 February 2006 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector; Commission Regulation (EC) No 968/2006 of 27 June 2006 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 320/2006 establishing a temporary scheme for the restructuring of the sugar industry in the Community; Agrana Zucker GmbH v Bundesministerium für Land- und Forstwirtschaft, Unwelt und Wasserwirtschaft (C-33/08); Council Regulation (EC) No 320/2006 of 20 February 2006 establishing a temporary scheme for the restructuring of the sugar industry in the Community and amending Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005 on the financing of the common agricultural policy; État du Grand-Duché de Luxembourg and Administration de l’enregistrement et des domaines v Pierre Feltgen and Bacino Charter Company SA (C-116/10); Bureau d'intervention et de restitution belge v Beneo-Orafti SA (C-150/10); József Uzonyi v Mezőgazdasági és Vidékfejlesztési Hivatal Központi Szerve (C-133/09); Commission Regulation (EC) No 493/2006 of 27 March 2006 laying down transitional measures within the framework of the reform of the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector, and amending Regulations (EC) No 1265/2001 and (EC) No 314/2002; Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2988/95 of 18 December 1995 on the protection of the European Communities financial interests; Rüdiger Jager v Amt für Landwirtschaft Bützow (C-420/06); Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001 of 19 June 2001 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector