Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Eva-Maria Painer v Standard VerlagsGmbH and Others (C-145/10)
Judgment
Admissibility of the request for a pre…
65

Eva-Maria Painer v Standard VerlagsGmbH and Others (C-145/10)

Judgment of 1 Dec 2011law://eu/cjeu/2010/c-145-10/para_65@2026-11-12

65Thus, even if the answer to the question referred leaves no scope for any reasonable doubt, that question does not thereby become inadmissible.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Third Chamber
Case: C-145/10 · ECLI:EU:C:2011:798
Decided: 1 Dec 2011
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the Handelsgericht Wien (Austria)
Applicant: Eva-Maria Painer
Defendants: Standard VerlagsGmbH; Axel Springer AG and 3 more
Süddeutsche Zeitung GmbH; Spiegel-Verlag Rudolf Augstein GmbH & Co KG; Verlag M. DuMont Schauberg Expedition der Kölnischen Zeitung GmbH & Co KG
Rapporteur: J. Malenovský
Advocate General: V. Trstenjak
Bench: 5 judges
K. Lenaerts, J. Malenovský, E. Juhász, G. Arestis, T. von Danwitz
Language: German
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62010CJ0145

Topics

Freedom of establishment Judicial cooperation in civil matters

History · 1 version

1 Dec 2011Reading

Connections

Interprets 3: Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters; Directive 2001/29/EC4 provisions; Council Directive 98/93/EC of 14 December 1998 amending Directive 68/414/EEC imposing an obligation on Member States of the EEC to maintain minimum stocks of crude oil and/or petroleum products
Cited by 22: Cartel Damage Claims (CDC) Hydrogen Peroxide SA v Evonik Degussa GmbH and Others (C-352/13); Cofemel – Sociedade de Vestuário SA v G-Star Raw CV (C-683/17)3 provisions; Nintendo Co. Ltd v BigBen Interactive GmbH and BigBen Interactive SA (C-24/16, C-25/16); Funke Medien NRW GmbH v Bundesrepublik Deutschland (C-469/17); Spiegel Online GmbH v Volker Beck (C-516/17); Staatlich genehmigte Gesellschaft der Autoren, Komponisten und Musikverleger registrierte Genossenschaft mbH (AKM) v Zürs.net Betriebs GmbH (C-138/16); Profit Investment SIM SpA v Stefano Ossi and Others (C-366/13); Land Nordrhein-Westfalen v Dirk Renckhoff (C-161/17); Confédération paysanne and Others v Premier ministre and Ministre de l'Agriculture et de l'Alimentation (C-688/21); Electricity & Water Authority of the Government of Bahrain and Others v Prysmian Netherlands BV and Others (C-672/23); T.T. and BAJI Trans, s.r. o. v Národný inšpektorát práce (C-544/23)2 provisions; Real Madrid Club de Fútbol and AE v EE and Société Éditrice du Monde SA (C-633/22); YL v Altenrhein Luftfahrt GmbH (C-70/20); Powiat Ostrowski v Ubezpieczeniowy Fundusz Gwarancyjny (C-383/19); SL v Vueling Airlines SA (C-86/19); View, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-49/19); „Оvergas Mrezhi“ AD and „Balgarska gazova asotsiatsia“ v Komisia za energiyno i vodno regulirane (KEVR) (C-5/19); State Street Bank International GmbH v Banca d'Italia (C-255/18); Marc Soulier and Sara Doke v Premier ministre and Ministre de la Culture et de la Communication (C-301/15); Vereniging Openbare Bibliotheken v Stichting Leenrecht (C-174/15); Aleksandrs Ranks and Jurijs Vasiļevičs v Finanšu un ekonomisko noziegumu izmeklēšanas prokoratūra and Microsoft Corp (C-166/15); Fag og Arbejde (FOA) v Kommunernes Landsforening (KL) (C-354/13)
Cites 24: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016); Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (consolidated 2016)2 provisions; Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters; Directive 2001/29/EC; 94/800/EC: Council Decision (of 22 December 1994) concerning the conclusion on behalf of the European Community, as regards matters within its competence, of the agreements reached in the Uruguay Round multilateral negotiations (1986-1994); Directive 2006/116/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 on the term of protection of copyright and certain related rights (codified version); Sociedad General de Autores y Editores de España (SGAE) v Rafael Hoteles SA (C-306/05); Infopaq International A/S v Danske Dagblades Forening (C-5/08); Stichting de Thuiskopie v Opus Supplies Deutschland GmbH and Others (C-462/09); 2000/278/EC: Council Decision of 16 March 2000 on the approval, on behalf of the European Community, of the WIPO Copyright Treaty and the WIPO Performances and Phonograms Treaty; Football Association Premier League Ltd and Others v QC Leisure and Others and Karen Murphy v Media Protection Services Ltd (C-403/08, C-429/08); Freeport plc v Olle Arnoldsson (C-98/06); Council Directive 93/98/EEC of 29 October 1993 harmonizing the term of protection of copyright and certain related rights; The Queen, on the application of ABNA Ltd and Others v Secretary of State for Health and Food Standards Agency, Fratelli Martini & C. SpA and Cargill Srl v Ministero delle Politiche Agricole e Forestali and Others, Ferrari Mangimi Srl and Associazione nazionale tra i produttori di alimenti zootecnici (Assalzoo) v Ministero delle Politiche Agricole e Forestali and Others and Nederlandse Vereniging Diervoederindustrie (Nevedi) v Productschap Diervoeder (C-453/03, C-11/04, C-12/04, C-194/04); Athanasios Kalfelis v Bankhaus Schröder, Münchmeyer, Hengst and Co. and others (189/87); Federico Cipolla v Rosaria Fazari, née Portolese and Stefano Macrino and Claudia Capoparte v Roberto Meloni (C-94/04, C-202/04); Unión General de Trabajadores de La Rioja (UGT-Rioja) and Others v Juntas Generales del Territorio Histórico de Vizcaya and Others (C-428/06); J. van der Weerd and Others, H. de Rooy sr. and H. de Rooy jr., Maatschap H. en J. van ’t Oever and Others and B. J. van Middendorp v Minister van Landbouw, Natuur en Voedselkwaliteit (C-222/05, C-223/05, C-224/05, C-225/05); Arnold André GmbH & Co. KG v Landrat des Kreises Herford (C-434/02); Michaniki AE v Ethniko Symvoulio Radiotileorasis and Ypourgos Epikrateias (C-213/07); Bacardi-Martini SAS and Cellier des Dauphins v Newcastle United Football Company Ltd (C-318/00); Stichting ter Exploitatie van Naburige Rechten (SENA) v Nederlandse Omroep Stichting (NOS) (C-245/00); The Queen, on the application of: Swedish Match AB and Swedish Match UK Ltd v Secretary of State for Health (C-210/03); Cooperativa Lattepiù arl v Azienda di Stato per gli interventi nel mercato agricolo (AIMA), Azienda Agricola Marcello Balestreri e Maura Lena v Regione Lombardia and Azienda di Stato per gli interventi nel mercato agricolo (AIMA), and Azienda Agricola Giuseppe Cantarello v Azienda di Stato per gli interventi nel mercato agricolo (AIMA) and Ministero delle Politiche Agricole e Forestali (C- 451/00) (C-231/00, C-303/00, C-451/00)