Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

European Union
Prism Investments BV v Jaap Anne van der Meer (C-139/10)
Judgment
The question referred for a preliminar…
28

Prism Investments BV v Jaap Anne van der Meer (C-139/10)

law://eu/cjeu/2010/c-139-10/para_28@2026-11-14

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

History · 1 version

13 Oct 2011Reading

28Such a procedure, according to the terms of recital 17 in the preamble to Regulation No 44/2001, may involve only a purely formal check of the documents required for enforceability in the Member State in which enforcement is sought.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Fourth Chamber
Case: C-139/10 · ECLI:EU:C:2011:653
Decided: 13 Oct 2011
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Netherlands)
Applicant: Prism Investments BV
Defendant: Jaap Anne van der Meer
Rapporteur: C. Toader
Advocate General: J. Kokott
Bench: 5 judges
J.-C. Bonichot, K. Schiemann, L. Bay Larsen, C. Toader, E. Jarašiūnas
Language: Dutch
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62010CJ0139

Topics

Judicial cooperation in civil matters

Judgment of 13 Oct 2011

Connections

Interprets 1: Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters
Cited by 8: flyLAL-Lithuanian Airlines AS v Starptautiskā lidosta Rīga VAS and Air Baltic Corporation AS (C-302/13); Trade Agency Ltd v Seramico Investments Ltd (C-619/10)2 provisions; Ágnes Weil v Géza Gulácsi (C-361/18)2 provisions; FX v GZ (C-41/19)2 provisions; ML v Aktiva Finants OÜ (C-433/18)2 provisions; Proceedings brought by Società Immobiliare Al Bosco Srl (C-379/17)2 provisions; Salzgitter Mannesmann Handel GmbH v SC Laminorul SA (C-157/12)2 provisions; Health Service Executive v S.C. and A.C (C-92/12 PPU)2 provisions
Cites 7: Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters; Meletis Apostolides v David Charles Orams and Linda Elizabeth Orams (C-420/07); Eric Coursier v Fortis Bank and Martine Coursier, née Bellami (C-267/97); P. Capelloni and F. Aquilini v J. C. J. Pelkmans (119/84); Prism Investments BV v Jaap Anne van der Meer (C-139/10); Deutsche Genossenschaftsbank v SA Brasserie du Pêcheur (148/84); Horst Ludwig Martin Hoffmann v Adelheid Krieg (145/86)