Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

European Union
Società Consortile Fonografici (SCF) v Marco Del Corso (C-135/10)
Judgment
The questions referred for a prelimina…
The first to third questions
42

Società Consortile Fonografici (SCF) v Marco Del Corso (C-135/10)

law://eu/cjeu/2010/c-135-10/para_42@2026-11-14

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

History · 1 version

15 Mar 2012Reading

42Consequently, the provisions of the Rome Convention do not form part of the legal order of the European Union.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Third Chamber
Case: C-135/10 · ECLI:EU:C:2012:140
Decided: 15 Mar 2012
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the Corte d’appello di Torino (Italy)
Applicant: Società Consortile Fonografici (SCF)
Defendant: Marco Del Corso
Rapporteur: J. Malenovský
Advocate General: V. Trstenjak
Bench: 5 judges
K. Lenaerts, J. Malenovský, E. Juhász, G. Arestis, T. von Danwitz
Language: Italian
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62010CJ0135

Topics

Approximation of laws Copyright and related rights International agreements World Trade Organisation (WTO)

Judgment of 15 Mar 2012

Connections

Interprets 2: Directive 2001/29/EC; Council Directive 92/100/EEC of 19 November 1992 on rental right and lending right and on certain rights related to copyright in the field of intellectual property
Cited by 20: Reha Training Gesellschaft für Sport- und Unfallrehabilitation mbH v Gesellschaft für musikalische Aufführungs- und mechanische Vervielfältigungsrechte eV (GEMA) (C-117/15)5 provisions; Pelham GmbH and Others v Ralf Hütter and Florian Schneider-Esleben (C-476/17); GS Media BV v Sanoma Media Netherlands BV and Others (C-160/15); Föreningen Svenska Tonsättares Internationella Musikbyrå u.p.a. (Stim) and Svenska artisters och musikers intresseorganisation ek. för. (SAMI) v Fleetmanager Sweden AB and Nordisk Biluthyrning AB (C-753/18); Levola Hengelo BV v Smilde Foods BV (C-310/17); Recorded Artists Actors Performers Ltd v Phonographic Performance (Ireland) Ltd and Others (C-265/19); Gesellschaft für musikalische Aufführungs- und mechanische Vervielfältigungsrechte eV (GEMA) v GL (C-135/23); Atresmedia Corporación de Medios de Comunicación S.A. v Asociación de Gestión de Derechos Intelectuales (AGEDI) and Artistas e Intérpretes o Ejecutantes, Sociedad de Gestión de España (AIE) (C-147/19)2 provisions; BY v CX (C-637/19); Kwantum Nederland BV and Kwantum België BV v Vitra Collections AG (C-227/23); Criminal proceedings against G. ST. T (C-655/21); Stichting Brein v Jack Frederik Wullems (C-527/15); Gesellschaft für musikalische Aufführungs- und mechanische Vervielfältigungsrechte eV (GEMA) v VHC 2 Seniorenresidenz und Pflegeheim gGmbH (C-127/24); Makeleio EPE and Zougla G.R. AE v Ethniko Symvoulio Radiotileorasis (ESR) (C-555/23); Changmao Biochemical Engineering Co. Ltd v European Commission (C-123/21 P); The KaiKai Company Jaeger Wichmann GbR v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-579/19); Verwertungsgesellschaft Rundfunk GmbH v Hettegger Hotel Edelweiss GmbH (C-641/15); Marc Soulier and Sara Doke v Premier ministre and Ministre de la Culture et de la Communication (C-301/15); Vereniging Openbare Bibliotheken v Stichting Leenrecht (C-174/15); Philips Lighting Poland S.A. and Philips Lighting BV v Council of the European Union (C-511/13 P)
Cites 13: Directive 2001/29/EC; Council Directive 92/100/EEC of 19 November 1992 on rental right and lending right and on certain rights related to copyright in the field of intellectual property; Directive 2006/115/EC; Decision 1994/800; Decision 2000/278; Football Association Premier League Ltd and Others v QC Leisure and Others and Karen Murphy v Media Protection Services Ltd (C-403/08, C-429/08); The Queen, on the application of International Air Transport Association and European Low Fares Airline Association v Department for Transport (C-344/04); Gianni Bettati v Safety Hi-Tech Srl (C-341/95); Portuguese Republic v Council of the European Union (C-149/96); Reinhold Haug v Land Baden-Württemberg (C-286/05); Stichting ter Exploitatie van Naburige Rechten (SENA) v Nederlandse Omroep Stichting (NOS) (C-245/00); Salomone Haim v Kassenzahnärztliche Vereinigung Nordrhein (C-424/97); Mediakabel BV v Commissariaat voor de Media (C-89/04)