105The Council also submits that this Court should adopt the same approach in the present case as that adopted when the Community institutions make assessments in relation to complex and broadly-defined objectives. According to the consistent case-law of the Court of Justice, those institutions then benefit from a wide discretion and their choices should be annulled only where they have made a manifest error of assessment or have been guilty of a misuse of power (see, for example, Joined Cases C-248/95 and C-249/95SAM Schiffahrt and Stapf [1997] ECR I-4475, paragraphs 24 and 25, and Case C-344/04IATA and ELFAA [2006] ECR I-403, paragraph 80).