Judgment_paragraph 461 · Saint-Gobain Glass France SA and Others v European Commission (T-56/09, T-73/09)

461As a preliminary point, the Court observes that the unlimited jurisdiction conferred on it in competition matters by Article 31 of Regulation No 1/2003, in application of Article 229 EC, authorises it, in addition to merely reviewing the legality of the penalty, which merely permits dismissal of the action for annulment or annulment of the contested measure, to vary the contested measure, even without annulling it, by taking account of all of the factual circumstances, by amending, in particular, the fine imposed where the question of the amount of the fine is before it (see Case C-534/07 P Prym and Prym Consumer v Commission [2009] ECR I-7415, paragraph 86 and the case-law cited; Limburgse Vinyl Maatschappij and Others v Commission, paragraph 86 above, paragraph 692; and Romana Tabacchi v Commission, paragraph 100 above, paragraph 265).

Saint-Gobain Glass France SA and Others v European Commission (T-56/09, T-73/09)

Key facts

History · 1 version

Connections