Judgment_paragraph 73 · Ifemy’s Holding GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (T-50/09)

73However, the mere fact that the time it takes to deliver a letter by post varies according to the country of dispatch does not allow the conclusion to be drawn that the taking into account of the date of receipt of the proof provided under Rule 22(2) of Regulation No 2868/95 discriminates between the persons concerned according to the country in which they are located when that proof is sent (see, to that effect, by analogy, Case T-293/07 P Lofaro v Commission [2008], ECR-SC I-B-1-85 and II-B-1-531, paragraph 49).

Ifemy’s Holding GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (T-50/09)

Key facts

History · 1 version

Connections