Judgment_paragraph 20 · Consejo Regulador de la Denominación de Origen Txakoli de Álava, Consejo Regulador de la Denominación de Origen Txakoli de Bizkaia and Consejo Regulador de la Denominación de Origen Txakoli de Getaria v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (T-341/09)

20Therefore, the distinctive character must be assessed, first, by reference to the goods or services in respect of which registration has been sought and, second, by reference to the perception which the relevant public has of those goods or services (see, by analogy, Case T-79/00 Rewe-Zentral v OHIM (LITE) [2002] ECR II-705, paragraph 27, and Joined Cases T-79/01 and T-86/01 Bosch v OHIM (Kit Pro and Kit Super Pro) [2002] ECR II-4881, paragraph 20).

Consejo Regulador de la Denominación de Origen Txakoli de Álava, Consejo Regulador de la Denominación de Origen Txakoli de Bizkaia and Consejo Regulador de la Denominación de Origen Txakoli de Getaria v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (T-341/09)

Key facts

History · 1 version

Connections