Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Electrabel v European Commission (T-332/09)
Judgment
Law
2. The alternative claims, seeking ann…
Third plea, alleging infringement of A…
209

Electrabel v European Commission (T-332/09)

law://eu/cjeu/2009/t-332-09/para_209@2026-11-15

Key facts

Court: General Court · Third Chamber
Case: T-332/09 · ECLI:EU:T:2012:672
Decided: 12 Dec 2012
Procedure: Action for annulment
Applicant: Electrabel
Defendant: European Commission
Rapporteur: O. Czúcz
Bench: 3 judges
O. Czúcz, I. Labucka, D. Gratsias
Language: French
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62009TJ0332

Topics

Concentrations between undertakings

History · 1 version

12 Dec 2012Reading

Judgment of 12 Dec 2012

209It follows that the Commission was correct to apply in the present case Article 1(1)(b) of Regulation No 2988/74 in order to take a limitation period of five years.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Connections

Cited by 10: Lagardère SA v European Commission (T-1119/23); YH v European Central Bank (T-366/23); Société du Tour de France v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-604/22); Mostostal SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-684/21); Altice Europe NV v European Commission (T-425/18)4 provisions; Sony Computer Entertainment Europe Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-35/16); Marine Harvest ASA v European Commission (T-704/14)9 provisions; BR IP Holder LLC v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (T-62/14); B. Braun Melsungen AG v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (T-513/13); Electrabel SA v European Commission (C-84/13)
Cites 21: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)5 provisions; Limburgse Vinyl Maatschappij NV (LVM), DSM NV and DSM Kunststoffen BV, Montedison SpA, Elf Atochem SA, Degussa AG, Enichem SpA, Wacker-Chemie GmbH and Hoechst AG and Imperial Chemical Industries plc (ICI) v Commission of the European Communities (C-238/99 P, C-244/99 P, C-245/99 P, C-247/99 P, C-250/99 P, C-251/99 P, C-252/99 P, C-254/99 P); Elf Aquitaine SA v European Commission (C-521/09 P); A. Ahlström Osakeyhtiö and others v Commission of the European Communities (89/85, 104/85, 114/85, 116/85, 117/85, 125/85, 126/85, 127/85, 128/85, 129/85); Lafarge SA v European Commission (C-413/08 P); Groupe Danone v Commission of the European Communities (T-38/02); United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland v Commission of the European Communities (C-180/96); General Electric Company v Commission of the European Communities (T-210/01); Microsoft Corp. v Commission of the European Communities (T-201/04); Dansk Rørindustri A/S, Isoplus Fernwärmetechnik Vertriebsgesellschaft mbH and Others, KE KELIT Kunststoffwerk GmbH, LR af 1998 A/S, Brugg Rohrsysteme GmbH, LR af 1998 (Deutschland) GmbH and ABB Asea Brown Boveri Ltd v Commission of the European Communities (C-189/02 P, C-202/02 P, C-205/02 P, C-206/02 P, C-207/02 P, C-208/02 P, C-213/02 P); Commission of the European Communities v Chambre syndicale nationale des entreprises de transport de fonds et valeurs (Sytraval) and Brink's France SARL (C-367/95 P); Knauf Gips KG v European Commission (C-407/08 P); Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89 of 21 December 1989 on the control of concentrations between undertakings; Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004; Bundesverband der Arzneimittel-Importeure eV and Commission of the European Communities v Bayer AG (C-2/01 P, C-3/01 P); Kingdom of Spain v Commission of the European Communities (C-525/04 P); SA Musique Diffusion française and others v Commission of the European Communities (100/80, 101/80, 102/80, 103/80); Baustahlgewebe GmbH v Commission of the European Communities (C-185/95 P); AC-Treuhand AG v Commission of the European Communities (T-99/04); French Republic v Commission of the European Communities (C-17/99); SGL Carbon AG v Commission of the European Communities (C-308/04)