Conseil national de l’Ordre des pharmaciens (CNOP) and Conseil central de la section G de l’Ordre national des pharmaciens (CCG) v European Commission (T-23/09)

Judgment of 26 Oct 2010

law://eu/cjeu/2009/t-23-09/para_45@2026-11-13

45The fact that the duty to state reasons in inspection decisions relates specifically to the protection of the rights of defence of the addressees does not alter the fact that a breach of the rights of the defence, which by its nature is individual, does not fall within the scope of an infringement of essential procedural requirements and, therefore, must not be raised by the Court of its own motion (Joined Cases T-67/00, T-68/00, T-71/00 and T-78/00 JFE Engineering and Others v Commission [2004] ECR II-2501, paragraph 425, and Corsica Ferries France v Commission, paragraph 39 above, paragraph 77). Consequently, the complaint alleging breach of the rights of the defence, made for the first time at the reply stage, must be rejected as inadmissible, pursuant to Article 48(2) of the Rules of Procedure.

Conseil national de l’Ordre des pharmaciens (CNOP) and Conseil central de la section G de l’Ordre national des pharmaciens (CCG) v European Commission (T-23/09)

Key facts

History · 1 version

Connections