Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Anheuser-Busch Inc. v Budějovický Budvar, národní podnik (C-96/09 P)
Judgment
The appeal
Second plea in law, concerning infring…
–Findings of the Court
189

Anheuser-Busch Inc. v Budějovický Budvar, národní podnik (C-96/09 P)

Judgment of 29 Mar 2011law://eu/cjeu/2009/c-96-09/para_189@2026-11-12

189Furthermore, in accordance with Article 74(1) of Regulation No 40/94, the burden of proving that that condition is met lies with the opponent before OHIM.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Grand Chamber
Case: C-96/09 P · ECLI:EU:C:2011:189
Decided: 29 Mar 2011
Procedure: Action for annulment
Ruled invalid: 62006TJ0225
Applicants: Anheuser-Busch Inc.; appellant
Defendants: Budějovický Budvar, národní podnik; applicant at first instance; Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)
Rapporteur: J.-C. Bonichot
Advocate General: P. Cruz Villalón
Bench: 13 judges
V. Skouris, A. Tizzano, J.N. Cunha Rodrigues, K. Lenaerts, J.-C. Bonichot, K. Schiemann, D. Šváby, A. Rosas, R. Silva de Lapuerta, E. Levits, U. Lõhmus, M. Safjan, M. Berger
Language: English
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62009CJ0096

Topics

History · 1 version

29 Mar 2011Reading

Connections

Interprets 2: Budějovický Budvar, národní podnik v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-225/06); Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark
Cited by 25: European Union Intellectual Property Office v Nowhere Co. Ltd (C-337/22 P); European Central Bank and European Commission v Francesca Corneli (C-777/22); Serana Europe GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-249/24); Serana Europe GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-250/24); Serana Europe GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-251/24); Levantur, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-505/22); Levantur, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-504/22); aTmos Industrielle Lüftungstechnik GmbH, Düsseldorf v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-694/21); Hofmeir Magnetics Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-452/22); Dorit-DFT Fleischereimaschinen GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-208/21); VF International Sagl v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-517/20); VF International Sagl v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-518/20); Banco Santander, SA v European Commission (C-52/19 P); Banco Santander, SA and Others v European Commission (C-53/19 P); Axa Mediterranean Holding, SA v European Commission (C-54/19 P); Prosegur Compañía de Seguridad, SA v European Commission (C-55/19 P); Sigma Alimentos Exterior, SL v European Commission (C-50/19 P); World Duty Free Group and Kingdom of Spain v European Commission (C-51/19 P); Indo European Foods Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-342/20); Sony Interactive Entertainment Europe Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-463/20); Abitron Germany GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-75/20); Klaus Berthold Besitzgesellschaft GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-284/20); CEDC International sp. z o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-796/16); Peek & Cloppenburg KG, Düsseldorf v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-446/18); Peek & Cloppenburg KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-444/18)
Cites 7: First Council Directive 89/104/EEC of 21 December 1988 to approximate the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks; Dansk Rørindustri A/S, Isoplus Fernwärmetechnik Vertriebsgesellschaft mbH and Others, KE KELIT Kunststoffwerk GmbH, LR af 1998 A/S, Brugg Rohrsysteme GmbH, LR af 1998 (Deutschland) GmbH and ABB Asea Brown Boveri Ltd v Commission of the European Communities (C-189/02 P, C-202/02 P, C-205/02 P, C-206/02 P, C-207/02 P, C-208/02 P, C-213/02 P); Budĕjovický Budvar, národní podnik v Rudolf Ammersin GmbH (C-478/07); Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark; Budějovický Budvar, národní podnik v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-225/06); Anheuser-Busch Inc. v Budějovický Budvar, národní podnik (C-96/09); Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs