Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
European Commission v Kronoply GmbH & Co. KG and Kronotex GmbH & Co. KG (C-83/09 P)
Judgment
The appeal
The third ground of appeal
Findings of the Court
65

European Commission v Kronoply GmbH & Co. KG and Kronotex GmbH & Co. KG (C-83/09 P)

Judgment of 24 May 2011law://eu/cjeu/2009/c-83-09/para_65@2026-11-11

65For that purpose, it is necessary for that undertaking to establish, to the requisite legal standard, that the aid is likely to have a specific effect on its situation (see, to that effect, 3F v Commission, paragraph 33).

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Grand Chamber
Case: C-83/09 P · ECLI:EU:C:2011:341
Decided: 24 May 2011
Procedure: Action for annulment
Applicant: European Commission
Defendants: Kronoply GmbH & Co. KG; Kronotex GmbH & Co. KG; applicants at first instance
Rapporteur: E. Levits
Advocate General: N. Jääskinen
Bench: 13 judges
V. Skouris, A. Tizzano, J.N. Cunha Rodrigues, K. Lenaerts, J.-C. Bonichot, A. Rosas, R. Silva de Lapuerta, J. Malenovský, U. Lõhmus, E. Levits, A. Ó Caoimh, M. Safjan, M. Berger
Language: German
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62009CJ0083

Topics

History · 1 version

24 May 2011Reading

Connections

Cited by 23: Ryanair DAC v European Commission (C-321/21 P); Ryanair DAC v European Commission (T-743/21); Wizz Air Hungary Légiközlekedési Zrt. (Wizz Air Hungary Zrt.) v European Commission (T-827/22); Penya Barça Lyon : Plus que des supporters (PBL) and Issam Abdelmouine v European Commission (C-224/23 P); European Commission v Kingdom of the Netherlands (C-40/23 P)2 provisions; Ryanair DAC v European Commission (C-353/21); Wizz Air Hungary Légiközlekedési Zrt. (Wizz Air Hungary Zrt.) v European Commission (C-440/22 P); Ryanair DAC v European Commission (C-209/21 P); Ryanair DAC v European Commission (C-210/21 P); Ryanair DAC v European Commission (T-225/21); Wizz Air Hungary Légiközlekedési Zrt. (Wizz Air Hungary Zrt.) v European Commission (T-332/21); Ryanair DAC v European Commission (T-14/21); Ryanair DAC v European Commission (T-333/21); Ryanair DAC v European Commission (T-769/20); Ryanair DAC v European Commission (C-320/21 P); Land Rheinland-Pfalz v Deutsche Lufthansa AG (C-466/21 P); UNSA Énergie v European Commission (T-322/22); Ryanair DAC and Condor Flugdienst GmbH v European Commission (T-34/21); Wizz Air Hungary Légiközlekedési Zrt. (Wizz Air Hungary Zrt.) v European Commission (T-142/21); European Commission v Anthony Braesch and Others (C-284/21 P)2 provisions; Kingdom of the Netherlands v European Commission (T-469/20); Interessengemeinschaft der Hoteliers und Gastronomen Region 10 eV (Ighoga Region 10) and Others v European Commission (T-582/20); Ryanair DAC v European Commission (T-657/20)
Cites 8: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)3 provisions; Kronoply GmbH & Co. KG and Kronotex GmbH & Co. KG v Commission of the European Communities (T-388/02); Council Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 of 22 March 1999 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 93 of the EC Treaty; Stadtwerke Schwäbisch Hall GmbH, Stadtwerke Tübingen GmbH and Stadtwerke Uelzen GmbH v Commission of the European Communities (C-176/06); British Aggregates Association v Commission of the European Communities and United Kingdom (C-487/06); SA Intermills v Commission of the European Communities (323/82); 3F v Commission of the European Communities (C-319/07); Commission of the European Communities v Aktionsgemeinschaft Recht und Eigentum eV (C-78/03 P)