Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Ferrero SpA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (C-552/09 P)
Judgment
The appeal
Ferrero’s legal interest in bringing p…
Findings of the Court
42

Ferrero SpA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (C-552/09 P)

Judgment of 24 Mar 2011law://eu/cjeu/2009/c-552-09/para_42@2026-11-12

42Secondly, contrary to OHIM’s contention, the surrender by Tirol Milch of the Community trade mark TiMi KiNDERJOGHURT is not, in itself, capable of rendering the appeal lodged by Ferrero devoid of purpose.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Fifth Chamber
Case: C-552/09 P · ECLI:EU:C:2011:177
Decided: 24 Mar 2011
Procedure: Action for annulment
Applicant: Ferrero SpA
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)
Rapporteur: A. Borg Barthet
Advocate General: J. Kokott
Bench: 3 judges
A. Borg Barthet, M. Ilešič, E. Levits
Language: English
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62009CJ0552

Topics

History · 1 version

24 Mar 2011Reading

Connections

Cited by 25: V-Label GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-464/24); Ffauf Italia SpA v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-425/24); OMV AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-303/24); Fattorie Garofalo - Società Cooperativa Agricola v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-1036/23); Desimo, Lda v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-607/23); Tecom Master, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-1053/23); Puma SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-30/24); Puma SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-11/24); Lucien Haddad v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-538/23); CFA Institute v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-561/22); Kneipp GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-157/23); VF International Sagl v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-639/22); Puma SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-184/23); CrossFit LLC v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-506/22); Productos Ibéricos Calderón y Ramos, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-384/22); Weider Germany GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-45/22); Ana Maria Alves Casas v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-681/21); Zitro International Sàrl v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-491/22); International Masis Tabak LLC v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-44/22); Puma SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-623/21); Grupo Eig Multimedia, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-796/21); Groupement des cartes bancaires (CB) v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-639/21); Puma SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-711/20); Tigercat International Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-251/21); ALO jewelry CZ s. r. o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-288/21)
Cites 15: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016); L & D SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office (C-488/06); Il Ponte Finanziaria SpA v European Union Intellectual Property Office (C-234/06 P); Calvin Klein Trademark Trust v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (C-254/09 P); Mülhens GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office (C-206/04 P); Aalborg Portland A/S, Irish Cement Ltd, Ciments français SA, Italcementi - Fabbriche Riunite Cemento SpA, Buzzi Unicem SpA and Cementir - Cementerie del Tirreno SpA v Commission of the European Communities (C-204/00 P, C-205/00 P, C-211/00 P, C-213/00 P, C-217/00 P, C-219/00 P); Akzo Nobel Chemicals Ltd and Akcros Chemicals Ltd v European Commission (C-550/07 P); Adidas-Salomon AG and Adidas Benelux BV v Fitnessworld Trading Ltd (C-408/01); Ferrero SpA v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-140/08); Waterford Wedgwood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd and Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (C-398/07); Gateway, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office (C-57/08); Media-Saturn-Holding GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (C-92/10); European Union Intellectual Property Office v Shaker di L. Laudato & C. Sas (C-334/05 P); Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark; Intel Corporation Inc. v CPM United Kingdom Ltd (C-252/07)