Judgment_paragraph 28 · Rakvere Piim AS and Maag Piimatööstus AS v Veterinaar- ja Toiduamet (C-523/09)

28It follows that Article 27(3) and (4) of Regulation No 882/2004 and Annex IV, section B to that regulation leave no discretion to the Member States as regards the fixing of the minimum rates referred to in those provisions, nor do they call for the adoption of implementing measures by those Member States.

Rakvere Piim AS and Maag Piimatööstus AS v Veterinaar- ja Toiduamet (C-523/09)

Key facts

History · 1 version

Connections