Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

European Union
Rakvere Piim AS and Maag Piimatööstus AS v Veterinaar- ja Toiduamet (C-523/09)
Judgment
Consideration of the questions referred
22

Rakvere Piim AS and Maag Piimatööstus AS v Veterinaar- ja Toiduamet (C-523/09)

law://eu/cjeu/2009/c-523-09/para_22@2026-11-15

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Fifth Chamber
Case: C-523/09 · ECLI:EU:C:2011:460
Decided: 7 Jul 2011
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the Tartu ringkonnakohus (Estonia)
Applicants: Rakvere Piim AS; Maag Piimatööstus AS
Defendant: Veterinaar- ja Toiduamet
Rapporteur: J.-J. Kasel
Advocate General: P. Cruz Villalón
Bench: 3 judges
J.-J. Kasel, E. Levits, M. Safjan
Language: Estonian
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62009CJ0523

Topics

Agriculture Approximation of laws Public health

History · 1 version

7 Jul 2011Reading

Judgment of 7 Jul 2011

22It follows that the minimum rates thus fixed must be considered as being basic rates from which the Member States are not, in principle, free to derogate.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Connections

Interprets 1: Regulation (EC) No 882/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on official controls performed to ensure the verification of compliance with feed and food law, animal health and animal welfare rules
Cited by 1: Pollo del Campo S.c.a. and Others v Regione Emilia-Romagna and Others and SAIGI Società Cooperativa Agricola a r.l. and MA.GE.MA. Società Agricola Cooperativa v Regione Emilia-Romagna and A.U.S.L. Romagna (C-199/18, C-200/18, C-343/18)2 provisions
Cites 4: Orsolina Leonesio v Ministero dell'agricoltura e foreste (93/71); Regulation (EC) No 882/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on official controls performed to ensure the verification of compliance with feed and food law, animal health and animal welfare rules; Herbert Handlbauer GmbH (C-278/02); Commission of the European Communities v Federal Republic of Germany (C-270/07)