61However, the argument supporting the present ground of appeal is not sufficiently clear and precise to enable the Court to exercise its judicial review. The essential points on which the present ground of appeal is based are not indicated sufficiently coherently and intelligibly in the text of the present appeal, which is worded in a vague and ambiguous manner in that regard. In those circumstances, the Court is not in a position to exercise its judicial review without running the risk of ruling ultra petita (see, inter alia, by analogy, Case C-194/99 PThyssen Stahl v Commission [2003] ECR I-10821, paragraph 106; Case C-227/04 PLindorfer v Council [2007] ECR I-6767, paragraph 83; Case C-343/08Commission v Czech Republic [2010] ECR I-275, paragraph 26; and Case C-67/09 PNuova Agricast and Cofra v Commission [2010] ECR I-9811, paragraphs 48 and 49).