Judgment_paragraph 70 · Inalca SpA — Industria Alimentari Carni and Cremonini SpA v European Commission (C-460/09 P)

70As regards the General Court’s alleged distortion of the order in Case T-124/99 Autosalone Ispra dei Fratelli Rossi v Commission, suffice it to note that the Court held that specific and detailed awareness by the victim of the facts is not one of the conditions which must be met in order for the limitation period to begin running (order in Case C-136/01 P Autosalone Ispra dei Fratelli Rossi v Commission, paragraph 31; Evropaïki Dynamiki v Commission, paragraph 37). Similarly, the subjective appraisal of the reality of the damage by the victim cannot be taken into consideration for the purpose of determining the moment at which the limitation period begins to run in proceedings brought against the European Union for non-contractual liability (Commission v Cantina sociale di Dolianova and Others, paragraph 61; Evropaïki Dynamiki v Commission, paragraph 37).

Inalca SpA — Industria Alimentari Carni and Cremonini SpA v European Commission (C-460/09 P)

History · 1 version

Key facts

Connections