Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Josep Peñarroja Fa (C-372/09, C-373/09)
Judgment
Consideration of the questions referred
The third question in Case C-372/09
55

Josep Peñarroja Fa (C-372/09, C-373/09)

Judgment of 17 Mar 2011law://eu/cjeu/2009/c-372-09/para_55@2026-11-11

55Among those overriding reasons in the public interest are the protection of litigants and the sound administration of justice.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Fourth Chamber
Cases: C-372/09, C-373/09 · ECLI:EU:C:2011:156
Decided: 17 Mar 2011
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the Cour de cassation (France)
Rapporteur: L. Bay Larsen
Advocate General: P. Mengozzi
Bench: 5 judges
J.-C. Bonichot, K. Schiemann, L. Bay Larsen, C. Toader, A. Prechal
Language: French
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62009CJ0372

Topics

Freedom to provide services

History · 1 version

17 Mar 2011Reading

Connections

Interprets 2: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)4 provisions; Directive 2005/36/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 September 2005 on the recognition of professional qualifications (Text with EEA relevance)
Cited by 10: ZZ v Secretary of State for the Home Department (C-300/11)2 provisions; Criminal proceedings against K.P (C-530/23); X-Steuerberatungsgesellschaft v Finanzamt Hannover-Nord (C-342/14); Halmer Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft UG v Rechtsanwaltskammer München (C-295/23)2 provisions; this act5 provisions; UAB „Manpower Lit“ v E.S. and Others (C-948/19); Paul Rosenich v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-527/14); Leopoldine Gertraud Piringer (C-342/15); Alain Laurent Brouillard v Jury du concours de recrutement de référendaires près la Cour de cassation and État belge (C-298/14); Hristo Gaydarov v Director na Glavna direktsia "Ohranitelna politsia" pri Ministerstvo na vatreshnite raboti (C-430/10)2 provisions
Cites 18: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)7 provisions; Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (consolidated 2016); Directive 2005/36/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 September 2005 on the recognition of professional qualifications (Text with EEA relevance); Commission of the European Communities v Italian Republic (C-439/99); Liga Portuguesa de Futebol Profissional and Bwin International Ltd v Departamento de Jogos da Santa Casa da Misericórdia de Lisboa (C-42/07); Union nationale des entraîneurs et cadres techniques professionnels du football (Unectef) v Georges Heylens and others (222/86); B.S.M. Geraets-Smits v Stichting Ziekenfonds VGZ and H.T.M. Peerbooms v Stichting CZ Groep Zorgverzekeringen (C-157/99); Presidente del Consiglio dei Ministri v Regione Sardegna (C-169/08); Freskot AE v Elliniko Dimosio (C-355/00); Angelo Rubino v Ministero dell'Università e della Ricerca (C-586/08); Conseil national de l'ordre des architectes v Nicolas Dreessen (C-31/00); Commission of the European Communities v Hellenic Republic (C-306/89); Isabel Burbaud v Ministère de l'Emploi et de la Solidarité (C-285/01); Jean Reyners v Belgian State (2/74); Josef Corsten (C-58/98); Commission of the European Communities v Ireland (249/81); Criminal proceedings against Jean-Claude Arblade and Arblade & Fils SARL and Bernard Leloup, Serge Leloup and Sofrage SARL (C-369/96, C-376/96); Irène Vlassopoulou v Ministerium für Justiz, Bundes- und Europaangelegenheiten Baden-Württemberg (C-340/89)