Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Artur Weryński v Mediatel 4B spółka z o.o. (C-283/09)
Judgment
The jurisdiction of the Court and the…
35

Artur Weryński v Mediatel 4B spółka z o.o. (C-283/09)

Judgment of 17 Feb 2011law://eu/cjeu/2009/c-283-09/para_35@2026-11-12

35Consequently, it must be determined whether the question referred to the Court is necessary to enable the referring court to ‘give judgment’ within the meaning of the second paragraph of Article 267 TFEU.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · First Chamber
Case: C-283/09 · ECLI:EU:C:2011:85
Decided: 17 Feb 2011
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the Sąd Rejonowy dla Warszawy Śródmieścia (Poland)
Applicant: Artur Weryński
Defendant: Mediatel 4B spółka z o.o.
Rapporteur: M. Berger
Advocate General: J. Kokott
Bench: 5 judges
A. Tizzano, J.-J. Kasel, A. Borg Barthet, M. Ilešič, M. Berger
Language: Polish
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62009CJ0283

Topics

Judicial cooperation in civil matters

History · 1 version

17 Feb 2011Reading

Connections

Interprets 1: Council Regulation (EC) No 1206/2001 of 28 May 2001 on cooperation between the courts of the Member States in the taking of evidence in civil or commercial matters
Cited by 10: Miasto Łowicz v Skarb Państwa – Wojewoda Łódzki and Prokurator Generalny v VX and Others (C-558/18, C-563/18)2 provisions; Stefan Fahnenbrock and Others v Hellenische Republik (C-226/13, C-245/13, C-247/13, C-578/13); Pebros Servizi Srl v Aston Martin Lagonda Ltd (C-511/14); Criminal proceedings against IS (C-564/19); I. J. v VĮ Registrų centras (C-789/23)2 provisions; UR v DF (C-134/24); ProRail BV v Xpedys NV and Others (C-332/11)2 provisions; Maurice Robert Josse Marie Ghislain Lippens and Others v Hendrikus Cornelis Kortekaas and Others (C-170/11)2 provisions; Ministero dell’Economia e delle Finanze and Agenzia delle Entrate v Elsacom NV (C-294/11)2 provisions; Interedil Srl, in liquidation v Fallimento Interedil Srl and Intesa Gestione Crediti SpA (C-396/09)
Cites 6: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)4 provisions; Council Regulation (EC) No 1206/2001 of 28 May 2001 on cooperation between the courts of the Member States in the taking of evidence in civil or commercial matters; Criminal proceedings against Maria Pupino (C-105/03); Criminal proceedings against Giovanni Dell'Orto (C-467/05); Ignacio Pedro Santesteban Goicoechea (C-296/08); Artur Weryński v Mediatel 4B spółka z o.o. (C-283/09)