Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
KME Germany AG, KME France SAS and KME Italy SpA v European Commission (C-272/09 P)
Judgment
The appeal
Fifth ground of appeal: infringement o…
Findings of the Court
93

KME Germany AG, KME France SAS and KME Italy SpA v European Commission (C-272/09 P)

Judgment of 8 Dec 2011law://eu/cjeu/2009/c-272-09/para_93@2026-11-12

93The judicial review of the decisions of the institutions was arranged by the founding Treaties. In addition to the review of legality, now provided for under Article 263 TFEU, a review with unlimited jurisdiction was envisaged in regard to the penalties laid down by regulations.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Second Chamber
Case: C-272/09 P · ECLI:EU:C:2011:810
Decided: 8 Dec 2011
Procedure: Action for annulment
Applicants: KME Germany AG; KME France SAS; KME Italy SpA
Defendant: European Commission
Rapporteur: A. Rosas
Advocate General: E. Sharpston
Bench: 5 judges
J.N. Cunha Rodrigues, U. Lõhmus, A. Rosas, A. Ó Caoimh, A. Arabadjiev
Language: English
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62009CJ0272

Topics

Agreements, decisions and concerted practices

History · 1 version

8 Dec 2011Reading

Connections

Cited by 21: Air France-KLM v European Commission (T-337/17); Société Air France v European Commission (T-338/17); Latam Airlines Group SA and Lan Cargo SA v European Commission (T-344/17); Cathay Pacific Airways Ltd v European Commission (T-343/17); SAS Cargo Group A/S and Others v European Commission (T-324/17); British Airways plc v European Commission (T-341/17); Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV v European Commission (T-325/17); Japan Airlines Co. Ltd v European Commission (T-340/17)2 provisions; Tokin Corp. v European Commission (T-343/18); Comune di Milano v European Commission (C-160/19 P)2 provisions; Nexans France and Nexans v European Commission (C-606/18 P); Stührk Delikatessen Import GmbH & Co. KG v European Commission (T-58/14); Furukawa Electric Co. Ltd v European Commission (T-444/14); Prysmian SpA and Prysmian Cavi e Sistemi Srl v European Commission (T-475/14); Nexans France and Nexans v European Commission (T-449/14); Marine Harvest ASA v European Commission (T-704/14); Duravit AG and Others v European Commission (C-609/13 P); Koninklijke Philips NV and Philips France v European Commission (T-762/14); H. Lundbeck A/S and Lundbeck Ltd v European Commission (T-472/13)2 provisions; Telefónica, SA v European Commission (T-216/13); Portugal Telecom SGPS, SA v European Commission (T-208/13)2 provisions
Cites 22: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)3 provisions; Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (consolidated 2016); Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 of 16 December 2002 on the implementation of the rules on competition laid down in Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty (Text with EEA relevance); Limburgse Vinyl Maatschappij NV (LVM), DSM NV and DSM Kunststoffen BV, Montedison SpA, Elf Atochem SA, Degussa AG, Enichem SpA, Wacker-Chemie GmbH and Hoechst AG and Imperial Chemical Industries plc (ICI) v Commission of the European Communities (C-238/99 P, C-244/99 P, C-245/99 P, C-247/99 P, C-250/99 P, C-251/99 P, C-252/99 P, C-254/99 P); Claude Chartry v Belgian State (C-457/09); KME Germany AG, KME France SAS and KME Italy SpA v European Commission (C-272/09); 2004/421/EC: Commission Decision of 16 December 2003 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 of the EC Treaty and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement against Wieland Werke AG, Outokumpu Copper Products OY, Outokumpu Oyj, KM Europa Metal AG, Tréfimétaux SA and Europa Metalli SpA (Case C.38.240 — Industrial tubes) (Text with EEA relevance) (notified under document number C(2003) 4820); Dansk Rørindustri A/S, Isoplus Fernwärmetechnik Vertriebsgesellschaft mbH and Others, KE KELIT Kunststoffwerk GmbH, LR af 1998 A/S, Brugg Rohrsysteme GmbH, LR af 1998 (Deutschland) GmbH and ABB Asea Brown Boveri Ltd v Commission of the European Communities (C-189/02 P, C-202/02 P, C-205/02 P, C-206/02 P, C-207/02 P, C-208/02 P, C-213/02 P); Commission of the European Communities v Tetra Laval BV (C-12/03 P); Aalborg Portland A/S, Irish Cement Ltd, Ciments français SA, Italcementi - Fabbriche Riunite Cemento SpA, Buzzi Unicem SpA and Cementir - Cementerie del Tirreno SpA v Commission of the European Communities (C-204/00 P, C-205/00 P, C-211/00 P, C-213/00 P, C-217/00 P, C-219/00 P); Kingdom of Spain v Commission of the European Communities (C-525/04 P); SA Musique Diffusion française and others v Commission of the European Communities (100/80, 101/80, 102/80, 103/80); Baustahlgewebe GmbH v Commission of the European Communities (C-185/95 P); Archer Daniels Midland Co. and Archer Daniels Midland Ingredients Ltd v Commission of the European Communities (C-397/03); William Prym GmbH & Co. KG and Prym Consumer GmbH & Co. KG v Commission of the European Communities (C-534/07); Établissements Consten S.à.R.L. and Grundig-Verkaufs-GmbH v Commission of the European Economic Community (C-56/64, C-58/64); Archer Daniels Midland Co. v Commission of the European Communities (C-510/06); EEC Council: Regulation No 17: First Regulation implementing Articles 85 and 86 of the Treaty; Activision Blizzard Germany GmbH v European Commission (C-260/09 P); DEB Deutsche Energiehandels- und Beratungsgesellschaft mbH v Bundesrepublik Deutschland (C-279/09); Brahim Samba Diouf v Ministre du Travail, de l’Emploi et de l’Immigration (C-69/10); KME Germany AG, KME France SAS and KME Italy SpA v Commission of the European Communities (T-127/04)