71As a preliminary point, it should be noted that the General Court was right to point out that the review it carries out under Article 63 of Regulation No 40/94 is a review of the legality of the decisions of the Boards of Appeal of OHIM and that it may annul or alter a decision against which an action has been brought only if, at the time the decision was adopted, it was vitiated by one of the grounds for annulment or alteration set out in Article 63(2) of that regulation (Case C-16/06 P Les Éditions Albert René v OHIM [2008] ECR I-10053, paragraph 123).
Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.