Judgment_paragraph 54 · Activision Blizzard Germany GmbH v European Commission (C-260/09 P)

54Even though it would be possible to interpret the faxes in question in the manner argued for by Activision Blizzard, it should nevertheless be stated that that is not the only way in which the wording of those faxes could be construed and that the different interpretation of those faxes adopted by the General Court does not reveal any distortion of their content. In particular, the line of argument set out by Activision Blizzard in support of its second ground of appeal does not bring to light any substantive inaccuracy in the General Court’s reading of those faxes.

Activision Blizzard Germany GmbH v European Commission (C-260/09 P)

Key facts

History · 1 version

Connections