Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Günter Fuß v Stadt Halle (C-243/09)
Judgment
The questions referred
64

Günter Fuß v Stadt Halle (C-243/09)

Judgment of 14 Oct 2010law://eu/cjeu/2009/c-243-09/para_64@2026-11-12

64In the present case, it is necessary that the rights conferred directly on workers by Article 6(b) of Directive 2003/88 be ensured in full in the national legal order (Dellas and Others, paragraph 53).

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Second Chamber
Case: C-243/09 · ECLI:EU:C:2010:609
Decided: 14 Oct 2010
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the Verwaltungsgericht Halle (Germany)
Applicant: Günter Fuß
Defendant: Stadt Halle
Rapporteur: A. Ó Caoimh
Advocate General: P. Mengozzi
Bench: 5 judges
J.N. Cunha Rodrigues, A. Arabadjiev, A. Rosas, U. Lõhmus, A. Ó Caoimh
Language: German
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62009CJ0243

Topics

History · 1 version

14 Oct 2010Reading

Connections

Interprets 1: Directive 2003/88/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 November 2003 concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time
Cited by 17: Proceedings brought by Banco de Santander SA (C-274/14); RTS infra BVBA and Aannemingsbedrijf Norré-Behaegel v Vlaams Gewest (C-387/19); Malvino Cervati and Società Malvi Sas di Cervati Malvino v Agenzia delle Dogane and Agenzia delle Dogane – Ufficio delle Dogane di Livorno (C-131/14); EA v Artemis security SAS (C-367/23)3 provisions; Federación de Servicios de Comisiones Obreras (CCOO) v Deutsche Bank SAE (C-55/18)2 provisions; Syndicat des cadres de la sécurité intérieure v Premier ministre and Others (C-254/18); AREX CZ a.s. v Odvolací finanční ředitelství (C-414/17); Alfredo Rendón Marín v Administración del Estado (C-165/14); Gergely Szemerey v Miniszterelnökséget vezető miniszter (C-330/14); Agenzia Italiana del Farmaco (AIFA) and Ministero della Salute v Doc Generici srl (C-452/14); Centre public d’action sociale d’Ottignies-Louvain-La-Neuve v Moussa Abdida (C-562/13); Greencarrier Freight Services Latvia SIA v Valsts ieņēmumu dienests (C-571/12)2 provisions; Crono Service scarl and Others and Anitrav — Associazione Nazionale Imprese Trasporto Viaggiatori v Roma Capitale and Regione Lazio (C-419/12, C-420/12)2 provisions; Terveys- ja sosiaalialan neuvottelujärjestö (TSN) ry v Terveyspalvelualan Liitto ry and Ylemmät Toimihenkilöt (YTN) ry v Teknologiateollisuus ry and Nokia Siemens Networks Oy (C-512/11, C-513/11)2 provisions; Airport Shuttle Express scarl and Others v Comune di Grottaferrata (C-162/12, C-163/12)2 provisions; Marc Betriu Montull v Instituto Nacional de la Seguridad Social (INSS) (C-5/12); Pensionsversicherungsanstalt v Peter Brey (C-140/12)2 provisions
Cites 20: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016); Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (consolidated 2016); Treaty on European Union (consolidated 2016); Directive 2003/88/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 November 2003 concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time; Bernhard Pfeiffer, Wilhelm Roith, Albert Süß, Michael Winter, Klaus Nestvogel, Roswitha Zeller and Matthias Döbele v Deutsches Rotes Kreuz, Kreisverband Waldshut eV (C-397/01, C-398/01, C-399/01, C-400/01, C-401/01, C-402/01, C-403/01); Kiriaki Angelidaki and Others v Organismos Nomarchiakis Autodioikisis Rethymnis, Charikleia Giannoudi v Dimos Geropotamou and Georgios Karabousanos and Sofoklis Michopoulos v Dimos Geropotamou (C-378/07); Campina GmbH & Co. v Hauptzollamt Frankfurt (Oder) (C-45/06); Fratelli Costanzo SpA v Comune di Milano (103/88); M. H. Marshall v Southampton and South-West Hampshire Area Health Authority (Teaching) (152/84); Commission of the European Communities v United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (C-484/04); Landeshauptstadt Kiel v Norbert Jaeger (C-151/02); Colin Wolf v Stadt Frankfurt am Main (C-229/08); ITC Innovative Technology Center GmbH v Bundesagentur für Arbeit (C-208/05); Abdelkader Dellas and Others v Premier ministre and Ministre des Affaires sociales, du Travail et de la Solidarité (C-14/04); Personalrat der Feuerwehr Hamburg v Leiter der Feuerwehr Hamburg (C-52/04); Arthur Wiedemann v Land Baden-Württemberg and Peter Funk v Stadt Chemnitz (C-329/06); Belinda Jane Coote v Granada Hospitality Ltd (C-185/97); Kirin Amgen Inc. v Lietuvos Respublikos valstybinis patentų biuras (C-66/09); Directive 2000/34/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 June 2000 amending Council Directive 93/104/EC concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time to cover sectors and activities excluded from that Directive; Council Directive 93/104/EC of 23 November 1993 concerning certain aspects of the organization of working time