Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Gerhard Dijkman and Maria Dijkman-Lavaleije v Belgische Staat (C-233/09)
Judgment
The question referred for a preliminar…
The existence of a restriction on the…
24

Gerhard Dijkman and Maria Dijkman-Lavaleije v Belgische Staat (C-233/09)

Judgment of 1 Jul 2010law://eu/cjeu/2009/c-233-09/para_24@2026-11-12

24Furthermore, it is settled case-law that Article 49 EC confers rights not only on the provider of services but also on the recipient (see, to that effect, Case C-290/04 FKP Scorpio Konzertproduktionen [2006] ECR I-9461, paragraph 32 and the case-law cited).

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · First Chamber
Case: C-233/09 · ECLI:EU:C:2010:397
Decided: 1 Jul 2010
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the hof van beroep te Antwerpen (Belgium)
Applicants: Gerhard Dijkman; Maria Dijkman-Lavaleije
Defendant: Belgische Staat
Rapporteur: E. Levits
Advocate General: P. Mengozzi
Bench: 5 judges
A. Tizzano, E. Levits, M. Ilešič, M. Safjan, M. Berger
Language: Dutch
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62009CJ0233

Topics

Free movement of capital

History · 1 version

1 Jul 2010Reading

Connections

Interprets 1: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)2 provisions
Cited by 17: FL v Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira (C-312/22); Frank Steinhoff and Others v European Central Bank (T-107/17); Brisal - Auto Estradas do Litoral SA and KBC Finance Ireland v Fazenda Pública (C-18/15); Charles Kohll and Sylvie Kohll-Schlesser v Directeur de l'administration des contributions directes (C-300/15); État belge, SPF Finances v NN (L) International (C-48/15); European Commission v Hellenic Republic (C-66/15); European Commission v Kingdom of Belgium (C-589/14); Proceedings brought by F.E. Familienprivatstiftung Eisenstadt (C-589/13); Finanzamt Ulm v Ingeborg Wagner-Raith (C-560/13); Helga Petersen and Peter Petersen v Finanzamt Ludwigshafen (C-544/11)2 provisions; European Commission v Kingdom of Belgium (C-387/11)2 provisions; X NV v Staatssecretaris van Financiën (C-498/10)2 provisions; Société d’investissement pour l’agriculture tropicale SA (SIAT) v État belge (C-318/10)2 provisions; European Commission v Federal Republic of Germany (C-284/09)2 provisions; European Commission v Portuguese Republic (C-493/09)2 provisions; Marc Michel Josemans v Burgemeester van Maastricht (C-137/09); Ingrid Schmelz v Finanzamt Waldviertel (C-97/09)2 provisions
Cites 21: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)3 provisions; Liga Portuguesa de Futebol Profissional and Bwin International Ltd v Departamento de Jogos da Santa Casa da Misericórdia de Lisboa (C-42/07); Glaxo Wellcome GmbH & Co. KG v Finanzamt München II (C-182/08); Fidium Finanz AG v Bundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht (C-452/04); Winfried L. Holböck v Finanzamt Salzburg-Land (C-157/05); FKP Scorpio Konzertproduktionen GmbH v Finanzamt Hamburg-Eimsbüttel (C-290/04); Test Claimants in the FII Group Litigation v Commissioners of Inland Revenue (C-446/04); Per Grønfeldt and Tatiana Grønfeldt v Finanzamt Hamburg-Am Tierpark (C-436/06); Hughes de Lasteyrie du Saillant v Ministère de l'Économie, des Finances et de l'Industrie (C-9/02); X and E. H. A. Passenheim-van Schoot v Staatssecretaris van Financiën (C-155/08); Amurta SGPS v Inspecteur van de Belastingdienst/Amsterdam (C-379/05); Petri Manninen (C-319/02); Commission of the European Communities v French Republic (C-34/98); Commission of the European Communities v Federal Republic of Germany (C-112/05); Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Belgium (C-478/98); Denkavit Internationaal BV and Denkavit France SARL v Ministre de l'Économie, des Finances et de l'Industrie (C-170/05); Société Papillon v Ministère du Budget, des Comptes publics et de la Fonction publique (C-418/07); Commission of the European Communities v Italian Republic (C-540/07); Hanns-Martin Bachmann v Belgian State (C-204/90); Test Claimants in Class IV of the ACT Group Litigation v Commissioners of Inland Revenue (C-374/04); Staatssecretaris van Financiën v B.G.M. Verkooijen (C-35/98)