Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Paul Miles and Others v Écoles européennes (C-196/09)
Judgment
The jurisdiction of the Court of Justice
The Court’s response
43

Paul Miles and Others v Écoles européennes (C-196/09)

Judgment of 14 Jun 2011law://eu/cjeu/2009/c-196-09/para_43@2026-11-11

43In those circumstances, the mere fact that the Complaints Board is required to apply the general principles of EU law when it has a dispute before it is not sufficient to make the Board fall within the definition of ‘court or tribunal of a Member State’ and thus within the scope of Article 267 TFEU.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Grand Chamber
Case: C-196/09 · ECLI:EU:C:2011:388
Decided: 14 Jun 2011
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the Chambre de recours des écoles européennes
Applicant: Paul Miles and Others
Defendant: European Schools
Rapporteur: M. Ilešič
Advocate General: E. Sharpston
Bench: 13 judges
V. Skouris, A. Tizzano, J.N. Cunha Rodrigues, K. Lenaerts, J.-C. Bonichot, A. Borg Barthet, M. Ilešič, J. Malenovský, U. Lõhmus, E. Levits, A. Ó Caoimh, L. Bay Larsen, T. von Danwitz
Language: French
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62009CJ0196

Topics

Freedom of movement for workers Non-discrimination on grounds of nationality Principles of Union law

History · 1 version

14 Jun 2011Reading

Connections

Cited by 9: Sky Österreich GmbH v Österreichischer Rundfunk (C-283/11)2 provisions; Marián Baláž (C-60/12)2 provisions; Angelo Alberto Torresi and Pierfrancesco Torresi v Consiglio dell’Ordine degli Avvocati di Macerata (C-58/13, C-59/13); Scuola europea di Varese v PD and LC (C-431/22)2 provisions; Slowakische Republik v Achmea BV (C-284/16); Europäische Schule München v Silvana Oberto and Barbara O´Leary (C-464/13, C-465/13); H. I. D. and B. A. v Refugee Applications Commissioner and Others (C-175/11)2 provisions; Valeri Hariev Belov v CHEZ Elektro Balgaria AD and Others (C-394/11)2 provisions; Camera di Commercio, Industria, Artigianato e Agricoltura (CCIAA) di Cosenza v Grillo Star Srl (C-443/09)2 provisions
Cites 8: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)6 provisions; Robert Koller (C-118/09); Armin Häupl v Lidl Stiftung & Co. KG (C-246/05); Dorsch Consult Ingenieurgesellschaft mbH v Bundesbaugesellschaft Berlin mbH (C-54/96); Unión de Pequeños Agricultores v Council of the European Union (C-50/00 P); 94/557/EC, Euratom: Council Decision of 17 June 1994 authorising the European Community and the European Atomic Energy Community to sign and conclude the Convention defining the Statute of the European Schools; Synetairismos Farmakopoion Aitolias & Akarnanias (Syfait) and Others v GlaxoSmithKline plc and GlaxoSmithKline AEVE (C-53/03); Parfums Christian Dior SA and Parfums Christian Dior BV v Evora BV (C-337/95)