PJ Hungary Szolgáltató kft (PJ Hungary kft) v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (T-580/08)

Judgment of 19 May 2011

law://eu/cjeu/2008/t-580-08/para_22@2026-11-14

22That document, produced for the first time before the Court, cannot be taken into account. The purpose of actions before the General Court is to review the legality of decisions of the Boards of Appeal of OHIM for the purposes of Article 63 of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 65 of Regulation No 207/2009), so it is not the Court’s function to review the facts in the light of documents produced for the first time before it. Accordingly the abovementioned document must be excluded, without it being necessary to assess its probative force (see, to that effect, Case C-346/04 Sadas v OHIM - LTJ Diffusion (ARTHUR ET FELICIE) [2005] ECR II-4891, paragraph 19, and the case-law cited).

PJ Hungary Szolgáltató kft (PJ Hungary kft) v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (T-580/08)

History · 1 version

Key facts

Connections