European Commission v Françoise Putterie-De-Beukelaer (T-160/08 P)

Judgment of 8 Jul 2010

law://eu/cjeu/2008/t-160-08/para_100@2026-11-14

100In the present case, it must be held that, as indicated at paragraphs 3 and 7 above, Article 1(2) of the Article 43 GIP sets out the object of the appraisal exercise and refers to a model report in Annex II, which therefore includes the heading entitled ‘Potential’. That annex, which forms an integral part of the Article 43 GIP, reflects the legislature’s intention that officials in categories C and D wishing to accede without restriction to function group AST should be recognised in advance, in the context of the CDR, as having the potential to carry out such functions (see, by analogy, Case 80/72 Koninklijke Lassiefabrieken [1973] ECR 635, paragraph 15).

European Commission v Françoise Putterie-De-Beukelaer (T-160/08 P)

Key facts

History · 1 version

Connections