Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Buczek Automotive sp. z o.o. v European Commission (T-1/08)
Judgment
Substance
Findings of the Court
69

Buczek Automotive sp. z o.o. v European Commission (T-1/08)

Judgment of 17 May 2011law://eu/cjeu/2008/t-1-08/para_69@2026-11-12

69Next, it is also settled case-law that Article 87 EC does not distinguish between measures of State intervention by reference to their causes or aims but defines them in relation to their effects (see Case C-480/98 Spain v Commission [2000] ECR I-8717, paragraph 16, and the case-law cited).

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: General Court · Second Chamber
Case: T-1/08 · ECLI:EU:T:2011:216
Decided: 17 May 2011
Procedure: Action for annulment
Applicant: Buczek Automotive sp. z o.o.
Defendant: European Commission
Rapporteur: K. Jürimäe
Bench: 3 judges
I. Pelikánová, K. Jürimäe, S. Soldevila Fragoso
Language: Polish
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62008TJ0001

Topics

History · 1 version

17 May 2011Reading

Connections

Cited by 7: Oltchim SA v European Commission (T-565/19); AlzChem AG v European Commission (T-284/15); Hellenic Republic v European Commission (T-314/15); FIH Holding A/S and FIH Erhvervsbank A/S v European Commission (T-386/14)2 provisions; Frucona Košice a.s. v European Commission (T-103/14)2 provisions; European Commission v Buczek Automotive sp. z o.o (C-405/11); European Commission v Republic of Poland (C-331/09)
Cites 17: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)4 provisions; Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (consolidated 2016); PreussenElektra AG v Schhleswag AG, in the presence of Windpark Reußenköge III GmbH and Land Schleswig-Holstein (C-379/98); Hijos de Andrés Molina, SA (HAMSA) v Commission of the European Communities (T-152/99); DSG Dradenauer Stahlgesellschaft mbH v Commission of the European Communities (C-323/00); Commission of the European Communities v Chambre syndicale nationale des entreprises de transport de fonds et valeurs (Sytraval) and Brink's France SARL (C-367/95 P); European Commission v Scott SA (C-290/07 P); European Commission v Frédéric Daffix (C-166/95 P); EnBW Energie Baden-Württemberg AG v Commission of the European Communities (T-387/04); Lenzing AG v Commission of the European Communities (T-36/99); Philip Morris Holland BV v Commission of the European Communities (C-730/79); Kingdom of Spain v Commission of the European Communities (C-480/98); Ryanair Ltd v Commission of the European Communities (T-196/04); Het Vlaamse Gewest (Flemish Region) v Commission of the European Communities (T-214/95); Déménagements-Manutention Transport SA (DMT) (C-256/97); EURL Le Levant 001 and Others v Commission of the European Communities (T-34/02); Italian Republic and SIM 2 Multimedia SpA v Commission of the European Communities (C-328/99, C-399/00)