Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Padawan SL v Sociedad General de Autores y Editores de España (SGAE) (C-467/08)
Judgment
The questions referred for a prelimina…
Substance
The first question
31

Padawan SL v Sociedad General de Autores y Editores de España (SGAE) (C-467/08)

Judgment of 21 Oct 2010law://eu/cjeu/2008/c-467-08/para_31@2026-11-11

31It should be noted at the outset that neither Article 5(2)(b) nor any other provision of Directive 2001/29 refers to the national law of the Member States as regards the concept of ‘fair compensation’.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Third Chamber
Case: C-467/08 · ECLI:EU:C:2010:620
Decided: 21 Oct 2010
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the Audiencia Provincial de Barcelona (Spain)
Applicant: Padawan SL
Defendant: Sociedad General de Autores y Editores de España (SGAE)
Rapporteur: J. Malenovský
Advocate General: V. Trstenjak
Bench: 5 judges
K. Lenaerts, D. Šváby, R. Silva de Lapuerta, E. Juhász, J. Malenovský
Language: Spanish
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62008CJ0467

Topics

Approximation of laws Copyright and related rights Freedom of establishment Freedom to provide services

History · 1 version

21 Oct 2010Reading

Connections

Interprets 1: Directive 2001/29/EC2 provisions
Cited by 22: CY and Others v Caixabank SA and Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria SA (C-224/19, C-259/19); Copydan Båndkopi v Nokia Danmark A/S (C-463/12); Microsoft Mobile Sales International Oy and Others v Ministero per i beni e le attività culturali (MiBAC) and Others (C-110/15); VCAST Limited v RTI SpA (C-265/16); Hewlett-Packard Belgium SPRL v Reprobel SCRL (C-572/13)2 provisions; Entidad de Gestión de Derechos de los Productores Audiovisuales (EGEDA) and Others v Administración del Estado and Asociación Multisectorial de Empresas de la Electrónica, las Tecnologías de la Información y la Comunicación, de las Telecomunicaciones y de los contenidos Digitales (AMETIC) (C-470/14)2 provisions; Austro-Mechana Gesellschaft zur Wahrnehmung mechanisch-musikalischer Urheberrechte Gesellschaft mbH v Strato AG (C-433/20); Funke Medien NRW GmbH v Bundesrepublik Deutschland (C-469/17); Spiegel Online GmbH v Volker Beck (C-516/17); Austro-Mechana Gesellschaft zur Wahrnehmung mechanisch-musikalischer Urheberrechte Gesellschaft mbH v Amazon EU Sàrl and Others (C-572/14); Johan Deckmyn and Vrijheidsfonds VZW v Helena Vandersteen and Others (C-201/13); Dragoș Constantin Târșia v Statul român and Serviciul Public Comunitar Regim Permise de Conducere si Inmatriculare a Autovehiculelor (C-69/14); Société de perception et de distribution des droits des artistes-interprètes de la musique et de la danse (Spedidam) and Others v Institut national de l’audiovisuel (C-484/18); ACI Adam BV and Others v Stichting de Thuiskopie and Stichting Onderhandelingen Thuiskopie vergoeding (C-435/12)2 provisions; Stichting Onderhandelingen Thuiskopie vergoeding and Stichting de Thuiskopie v HP Nederland BV and Others (C-496/24); Reprobel CV v Copaco Belgium NV (C-230/23); „Оvergas Mrezhi“ AD and „Balgarska gazova asotsiatsia“ v Komisia za energiyno i vodno regulirane (KEVR) (C-5/19); VIPA Kereskedelmi és Szolgáltató Kft. v Országos Gyógyszerészeti és Élelmezés-egészségügyi Intézet (C-222/18); Bayer Pharma AG v Richter Gedeon Vegyészeti Gyár Nyrt. and Exeltis Magyarország Gyógyszerkereskedelmi Kft (C-688/17); ITV Broadcasting Limited and Others v TVCatchup Limited and Others (C-275/15); Minister Finansów v Stowarzyszenie Artystów Wykonawców Utworów Muzycznych i Słowno-Muzycznych SAWP (SAWP) (C-37/16); Texdata Software GmbH (C-418/11)
Cites 19: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)2 provisions; Directive 2001/29/EC; Council Directive 92/100/EEC of 19 November 1992 on rental right and lending right and on certain rights related to copyright in the field of intellectual property; Vincenzo Manfredi v Lloyd Adriatico Assicurazioni SpA, Antonio Cannito v Fondiaria Sai SpA and Nicolò Tricarico and Pasqualina Murgolo v Assitalia SpA (C-295/04, C-296/04, C-297/04, C-298/04); Sociedad General de Autores y Editores de España (SGAE) v Rafael Hoteles SA (C-306/05); Ekro BV Vee- en Vleeshandel v Produktschap voor Vee en Vlees (327/82); VTB-VAB NV v Total Belgium NV and Galatea BVBA v Sanoma Magazines Belgium NV (C-261/07); Marleasing SA v La Comercial Internacional de Alimentacion SA (C-106/89); Laserdisken ApS v Kulturministeriet (C-479/04); PreussenElektra AG v Schhleswag AG, in the presence of Windpark Reußenköge III GmbH and Land Schleswig-Holstein (C-379/98); Kiriaki Angelidaki and Others v Organismos Nomarchiakis Autodioikisis Rethymnis, Charikleia Giannoudi v Dimos Geropotamou and Georgios Karabousanos and Sofoklis Michopoulos v Dimos Geropotamou (C-378/07); Grand Duchy of Luxemburg v Berthe Linster, Aloyse Linster and Yvonne Linster (C-287/98); A (C-523/07); Georgios Orfanopoulos and Others and Raffaele Oliveri v Land Baden-Württemberg (C-482/01, C-493/01); Arkkitehtuuritoimisto Riitta Korhonen Oy, Arkkitehtitoimisto Pentti Toivanen Oy and Rakennuttajatoimisto Vilho Tervomaa v Varkauden Taitotalo Oy (C-18/01); Jobra Vermögensverwaltungs-Gesellschaft mbH v Finanzamt Amstetten Melk Scheibbs (C-330/07); Triveneta Zuccheri SpA and others v Commission of the European Communities (C-347/87); Christelle Deliège v Ligue francophone de judo et disciplines associées ASBL, Ligue belge de judo ASBL, Union européenne de judo and François Pacquée (C-51/96, C-191/97); Stichting ter Exploitatie van Naburige Rechten (SENA) v Nederlandse Omroep Stichting (NOS) (C-245/00)