40Furthermore, even if the legislation at issue in the main proceedings were to have restrictive effects on free movement of capital, it follows from the case-law that those effects would be the unavoidable consequence of an obstacle to freedom of establishment and would not therefore justify an independent examination of that legislation from the point of view of Article 56 EC (see, by way of analogy, Case C-196/04 Cadbury Schweppes and Cadbury Schweppes Overseas [2006] ECR I-7995, paragraph 33; Case C-231/05 Oy AA [2007] ECR I-6373, paragraph 24; and Case C-284/06 Burda [2008] ECR I-4571, paragraph 74).
Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.