48Following that examination, it will be appropriate to answer the second question in Case C-236/08, by which the Court is asked to examine the same problem from the angle of Article 5(2) of Directive 89/104 and Article 9(1)(c) of Regulation No 40/94, which concern the rights conferred by reputable trade marks. Subject to verification by the Cour de cassation, it appears from the reference for a preliminary ruling that the legislation applicable in France includes the rule referred to in Article 5(2) of Directive 89/104. Furthermore, the Court has stated that that provision of the directive must be interpreted not solely on the basis of its wording, but also in the light of the overall scheme and objectives of the system of which it is a part. Accordingly, the rule referred to in Article 5(2) of Directive 89/104 concerns not only situations in which a third party uses a sign identical with, or similar to, a sign which has a reputation for goods or services which are not similar to those for which that trade mark is registered, but also situations in which such use is made for goods or services which are identical with, or similar to, those for which that trade mark is registered (Case C-292/00 Davidoff [2003] ECR I-389, paragraphs 24 to 30, and Case C-102/07 adidas and adidas Benelux [2008] ECR I-2439, paragraph 37).
Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.