Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Susanne Gassmayr v Bundesminister für Wissenschaft und Forschung (C-194/08)
Judgment
The questions referred for a prelimina…
Questions 1(b) and (c) on the right to…
The entitlement to the on-call duty al…
86

Susanne Gassmayr v Bundesminister für Wissenschaft und Forschung (C-194/08)

Judgment of 1 Jul 2010law://eu/cjeu/2008/c-194-08/para_86@2026-11-11

86Where a worker is absent from work because she is on maternity leave, the minimum protection required by Article 11(2) and (3) of Directive 92/85 does not therefore require that the person concerned should continue to receive full pay or the payment of the on-call duty allowance.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Third Chamber
Case: C-194/08 · ECLI:EU:C:2010:386
Decided: 1 Jul 2010
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the Verwaltungsgerichtshof (Austria)
Applicant: Susanne Gassmayr
Defendant: Bundesminister für Wissenschaft und Forschung
Rapporteur: A. Ó Caoimh
Advocate General: M. Poiares Maduro
Bench: 5 judges
J.N. Cunha Rodrigues, P. Lindh, A. Rosas, A. Ó Caoimh, A. Arabadjiev
Language: German
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62008CJ0194

Topics

History · 1 version

1 Jul 2010Reading

Connections

Interprets 1: Council Directive 92/85/EEC of 19 October 1992 on the introduction of measures to encourage improvements in the safety and health at work of pregnant workers and workers who have recently given birth or are breastfeeding (tenth individual Directive within the meaning of Article 16 (1) of Directive 89/391/EEC)
Cited by 5: RTS infra BVBA and Aannemingsbedrijf Norré-Behaegel v Vlaams Gewest (C-387/19); Finanzamt Kaufbeuren mit Außenstelle Füssen v Golfclub Schloss Igling e.V (C-488/18); BY and CZ v Bundesrepublik Deutschland (C-321/19); Maria Cristina Elisabetta Ornano v Ministero della Giustizia, Direzione Generale dei Magistrati del Ministero (C-335/15)2 provisions; Williams and Others v British Airways plc (C-155/10)2 provisions
Cites 22: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)3 provisions; Bernhard Pfeiffer, Wilhelm Roith, Albert Süß, Michael Winter, Klaus Nestvogel, Roswitha Zeller and Matthias Döbele v Deutsches Rotes Kreuz, Kreisverband Waldshut eV (C-397/01, C-398/01, C-399/01, C-400/01, C-401/01, C-402/01, C-403/01); Union royale belge des sociétés de football association ASBL v Jean-Marc Bosman, Royal club liégeois SA v Jean-Marc Bosman and others and Union des associations européennes de football (UEFA) v Jean-Marc Bosman (C-415/93); Ordre des barreaux francophones et germanophone and Others v Conseil des ministres (C-305/05); Criminal proceedings against Massimiliano Placanica, Christian Palazzese and Angelo Sorricchio (C-338/04, C-359/04, C-360/04); Idéal tourisme SA v Belgian State (C-36/99); Impact v Minister for Agriculture and Food and Others (C-268/06); Cooperativa Agricola Zootecnica S. Antonio and Others v Amministrazione delle finanze dello Stato (C-246/94, C-247/94, C-248/94, C-249/94); Council Directive 92/85/EEC of 19 October 1992 on the introduction of measures to encourage improvements in the safety and health at work of pregnant workers and workers who have recently given birth or are breastfeeding (tenth individual Directive within the meaning of Article 16 (1) of Directive 89/391/EEC); Commission of the European Communities v Republic of Austria (C-203/03); Caisse nationale d'assurance vieillesse des travailleurs salariés (CNAVTS) v Evelyne Thibault (C-136/95); Ulrich Hofmann v Barmer Ersatzkasse (184/83); Margaret Boyle and Others v Equal Opportunities Commission (C-411/96); Joan Gillespie and others v Northern Health and Social Services Boards, Department of Health and Social Services, Eastern Health and Social Services Board and Southern Health and Social Services Board (C-342/93); The Queen v Secretary of State for Trade and Industry, ex parte Broadcasting, Entertainment, Cinematographic and Theatre Union (BECTU) (C-173/99); Flughafen Köln/Bonn GmbH v Hauptzollamt Köln (C-226/07); Maria Luisa Jiménez Melgar v Ayuntamiento de Los Barrios (C-438/99); Sanna Maria Parviainen v Finnair Oyj (C-471/08); Michelle K. Alabaster v Woolwich plc and Secretary of State for Social Security (C-147/02); G. Pohl-Boskamp GmbH & Co. KG v Gemeinsamer Bundesausschuss (C-317/05); Jämställdhetsombudsmannen v Örebro läns landsting (C-236/98); Handels- og Kontorfunktionærernes Forbund i Danmark, acting on behalf of Berit Høj Pedersen v Fællesforeningen for Danmarks Brugsforeninger and Dansk Tandlægeforening and Kristelig Funktionær-Organisation v Dansk Handel & Service (C-66/96)