Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Mediaset SpA v European Commission (T-177/07)
Judgment
Background to the dispute
9

Mediaset SpA v European Commission (T-177/07)

Judgment of 15 Jun 2010law://eu/cjeu/2007/t-177-07/para_9@2026-11-11

9On 24 January 2007, the Commission adopted Decision 2007/374/EC on State aid C 52/2005 (ex NN 88/2005, ex CP 101/2004) implemented by the Italian Republic for the subsidised purchase of digital decoders (OJ 2007 L 147, p. 1; ‘the contested decision’).

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: General Court · Second Chamber
Case: T-177/07 · ECLI:EU:T:2010:233
Decided: 15 Jun 2010
Procedure: Action for annulment
Applicant: Mediaset SpA
Defendant: European Commission
Rapporteur: K. Jürimäe
Bench: 3 judges
I. Pelikánová, K. Jürimäe, S. Soldevila Fragoso
Language: English
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62007TJ0177

Topics

History · 1 version

15 Jun 2010Reading

Connections

Cited by 15: PT Musim Mas v European Commission (T-176/23); Volotea, SA v European Commission (T-607/17)3 provisions; easyJet Airline Co. Ltd v European Commission (T-8/18)3 provisions; Germanwings GmbH v European Commission (T-716/17)4 provisions; Achemos Grupė UAB and Achema AB v European Commission (T-417/16); a&o hostel and hotel Berlin GmbH, successor in law to A & O Hotel and Hostel Friedrichshain GmbH v European Commission (T-578/17); Athletic Club v European Commission (T-679/16); Biogaran v European Commission (T-677/14); Deutsche Telekom AG v European Commission (T-207/10); Republic of Austria v European Commission (T-356/15)4 provisions; Hellenic Republic v European Commission (T-314/15); EDF Toruń SA v European Chemicals Agency (T-758/15); Kingdom of Spain v European Commission (T-808/14); Abertis Telecom Terrestre, SA and Telecom Castilla-La Mancha, SA v European Commission (T-37/15); Export Development Bank of Iran v Council of the European Union (T-89/14)
Cites 23: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)3 provisions; Ireland v Commission of the European Communities (C-199/03); Innova Privat-Akademie GmbH v Commission of the European Communities (T-273/01); France Télécom SA v Commission of the European Communities (T-340/03); French Republic v Commission of the European Communities (C-17/99); Federal Republic of Germany v Commission of the European Communities (C-277/00); Commission of the European Communities v French Republic (C-441/06); Kingdom of the Netherlands v Commission of the European Communities (C-382/99); Westdeutsche Landesbank Girozentrale and Land Nordrhein-Westfalen v Commission of the European Communities (T-228/99, T-233/99); Siemens SA v Commission of the European Communities (T-459/93); Asia Motor France SA, Jean-Michel Cesbron, Monin Automobiles SA, Europe Auto Service (EAS) SA and SA Somaco SARL v Commission of the European Communities (T-387/94); Fleuren Compost BV v Commission of the European Communities (T-109/01); Commission of the European Communities v Hellenic Republic (C-415/03); Technische Glaswerke Ilmenau GmbH v Commission of the European Communities (T-198/01); Confederación Española de Transporte de Mercancías (CETM) v Commission of the European Communities (T-55/99); Italian Republic v Commission of the European Communities (T-424/05); P & O European Ferries (Vizcaya), SA and Diputación Foral de Vizcaya v Commission of the European Communities (T-116/01, T-118/01); Iride SpA and Iride Energia SpA v Commission of the European Communities (T-25/07); Cipeke - Comércio e Indústria de Papel Ldª v Commission of the European Communities (T-84/96); Commission of the European Communities v Chambre syndicale nationale des entreprises de transport de fonds et valeurs (Sytraval) and Brink's France SARL (C-367/95 P); Italian Republic v Commission of the European Communities (C-310/99); Paul de Hoe v Commission of the European Communities (T-85/92); Council Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 of 22 March 1999 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 93 of the EC Treaty