Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
European Commission v Scott SA (C-290/07 P)
Judgment
The appeal
The 7th ground of appeal, alleging tha…
Findings of the Court
91

European Commission v Scott SA (C-290/07 P)

Judgment of 2 Sept 2010law://eu/cjeu/2007/c-290-07/para_91@2026-11-10

91It should also be borne in mind that the lawfulness of a decision concerning State aid falls to be assessed by the European Union judicature in the light of the information available to the Commission at the time when the decision was adopted (Case C-390/06 Nuova Agricast [2008] ECR I-2577, paragraph 54).

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · First Chamber
Case: C-290/07 P · ECLI:EU:C:2010:480
Decided: 2 Sept 2010
Procedure: Action for annulment
Ruled invalid: 62000TJ0366(01)
Applicant: European Commission
Defendant: Scott SA
Rapporteur: E. Levits
Advocate General: P. Mengozzi
Bench: 5 judges
A. Tizzano, E. Levits, J.-J. Kasel, M. Safjan, M. Berger
Language: English
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62007CJ0290

Topics

History · 1 version

2 Sept 2010Reading

Connections

Interprets 1: Scott SA v Commission of the European Communities (T-366/00)
Cited by 23: Arina Evgheni Corşicova v Council of the European Union (T-345/24); Victor Petrov v Council of the European Union (T-344/24); EVH GmbH and Others v European Commission (C-464/23); Koiviston Auto Helsinki Oy v European Commission (C-697/22 P)2 provisions; Ryanair DAC v European Commission (T-28/22); José María Galván Fernández-Guillén v Single Resolution Board (T-340/20); ACMO Sàrl and Others v Single Resolution Board (T-330/20); Laura Molina Fernández v Single Resolution Board (T-304/20); Antonio Del Valle Ruíz and Others v Single Resolution Board (T-302/20); Atlas Copco Airpower and Others v European Commission (T-278/16); ZF CV Systems Europe, anciennement Wabco Europe v European Commission (T-637/16); Volotea, SA and easyJet Airline Company Ltd. v European Commission (C-331/20 P); Interessengemeinschaft der Hoteliers und Gastronomen Region 10 eV (Ighoga Region 10) and Others v European Commission (T-582/20); Tartu Agro AS v European Commission (T-150/20)2 provisions; Mead Johnson Nutrition (Asia Pacific) Pte Ltd and Others v European Commission (T-508/19); TUIfly GmbH v European Commission (T-447/18); Achema AB and Achema Gas Trade UAB v European Commission (T-193/19); Nike European Operations Netherlands BV and Converse Netherlands BV v European Commission (T-648/19); Marie-Christine Arnautu v European Parliament (T-740/20); Irish Wind Farmers' Association Clg and Others v European Commission (T-680/19); Joëlle Mélin v European Parliament (T-51/20); Ryanair DAC v European Commission (T-643/20); Ryanair DAC v European Commission (T-465/20)
Cites 10: Commission of the European Communities v Tetra Laval BV (C-12/03 P); Kingdom of Spain v Commission of the European Communities (C-525/04 P); GlaxoSmithKline Services Unlimited v Commission of the European Communities and Commission of the European Communities v GlaxoSmithKline Services Unlimited and European Association of Euro Pharmaceutical Companies (EAEPC) v Commission of the European Communities and Asociación de exportadores españoles de productos farmacéuticos (Aseprofar) v Commission of the European Communities (C-501/06); Nuova Agricast Srl v Ministero delle Attività Produttive (C-390/06); 2002/14/EC: Commission Decision of 12 July 2000 on the state aid granted by France to Scott Paper SA Kimberly-Clark (Text with EEA relevance) (notified under document number C(2000) 2183); Moser Baer India Ltd v Council of the European Union (C-535/06); Scott SA v Commission of the European Communities (T-366/00); Kingdom of Belgium v Commission of the European Communities (C-56/93); Italian Republic and SIM 2 Multimedia SpA v Commission of the European Communities (C-328/99, C-399/00); Commission of the European Communities v Chambre syndicale nationale des entreprises de transport de fonds et valeurs (Sytraval) and Brink's France SARL (C-367/95 P)