Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Trioplast Industrier AB v European Commission (T-40/06)
Judgment
Procedure and forms of order sought
26

Trioplast Industrier AB v European Commission (T-40/06)

Judgment of 13 Sept 2010law://eu/cjeu/2006/t-40-06/para_26@2026-11-12

26By order of 15 June 2010, the President of the Sixth Chamber of the Court decided, after hearing the parties, to join the present case with Case T-26/06 (Trioplast Wittenheim v Commission) for the purposes of the oral procedure, in accordance with Article 50 of the Court’s Rules of Procedure.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: General Court · Sixth Chamber
Case: T-40/06 · ECLI:EU:T:2010:388
Decided: 13 Sept 2010
Procedure: Action for annulment
Applicant: Trioplast Industrier AB
Defendant: European Commission
Rapporteur: A.W.H. Meij
Bench: 3 judges
A.W.H. Meij, V. Vadapalas, L. Truchot
Language: Swedish
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62006TJ0040

Topics

History · 1 version

13 Sept 2010Reading

Connections

Cited by 17: Tokin Corp. v European Commission (T-343/18); Huhtamäki Oyj and Huhtamaki Flexible Packaging Germany GmbH & Co.KG v European Commission (T-530/15); Deutsche Telekom AG v European Commission (T-827/14); Slovak Telekom, a.s. v European Commission (T-851/14); Silec Cable and General Cable Corp. v European Commission (T-438/14); Trioplast Industrier AB v European Commission (C-364/16); Plásticos Españoles, SA (ASPLA) and Armando Álvarez, SA v European Union, represented by the Court of Justice of the European Union (T-40/15)2 provisions; Kendrion NV v European Union, represented by the Court of Justice of the European Union (T-479/14)2 provisions; Gascogne Sack Deutschland GmbH and Gascogne v European Union (T-577/14)2 provisions; Trioplast Industrier AB v European Commission (T-669/14); Eni SpA v European Commission (T-558/08)2 provisions; Esso Société anonyme française and Others v European Commission (T-540/08)2 provisions; Sasol and Others v European Commission (T-541/08)2 provisions; FLS Plast A/S v European Commission (C-243/12 P); FLSmidth & Co. A/S v European Commission (C-238/12 P)2 provisions; Areva and Others v European Commission (C-247/11 P, C-253/11 P); Guardian Industries Corp. and Guardian Europe Sàrl v European Commission (T-82/08)2 provisions
Cites 24: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)2 provisions; Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 of 16 December 2002 on the implementation of the rules on competition laid down in Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty (Text with EEA relevance); Lafarge SA v European Commission (C-413/08 P); Archer Daniels Midland Company and Archer Daniels Midland Ingredients Ltd v Commission of the European Communities (T-224/00); Hoek Loos NV v Commission of the European Communities (T-304/02); Erste Group Bank AG, Raiffeisen Zentralbank Österreich AG, Bank Austria Creditanstalt AG and Österreichische Volksbanken AG v Commission of the European Communities (C-125/07); Cascades SA v Commission of the European Communities (C-279/98 P); Dunlop Slazenger International Ltd v Commission of the European Communities (T-43/92); Cimenteries CBR and Others v Commission of the European Communities (T-25/95, T-26/95, T-30/95, T-31/95, T-32/95, T-34/95, T-35/95, T-36/95, T-37/95, T-38/95, T-39/95, T-42/95, T-43/95, T-44/95, T-45/95, T-46/95, T-48/95, T-50/95, T-51/95, T-52/95, T-53/95, T-54/95, T-55/95, T-56/95, T-57/95, T-58/95, T-59/95, T-60/95, T-61/95, T-62/95, T-63/95, T-64/95, T-65/95, T-68/95, T-69/95, T-70/95, T-71/95, T-87/95, T-88/95, T-103/95, T-104/95); Peróxidos Orgánicos, SA v Commission of the European Communities (T-120/04); Tokai Carbon Co. Ltd and Others v Commission of the European Communities (T-236/01, T-239/01, T-244/01, T-245/01, T-246/01, T-251/01, T-252/01); IMI plc, IMI Kynoch Ltd and Yorkshire Copper Tube v European Commission (T-18/05); Amann & Söhne GmbH & Co. KG and Cousin Filterie SAS v European Commission (T-446/05); Hoechst GmbH v Commission of the European Communities (T-410/03); ABB Asea Brown Boveri Ltd v Commission of the European Communities (T-31/99); LR AF 1998 A/S, formerly Løgstør Rør A/S v Commission of the European Communities (T-23/99); Archer Daniels Midland Co. v Commission of the European Communities (T-329/01); Westfalen Gassen Nederland BV v Commission of the European Communities (T-303/02); NV IAZ International Belgium and others v Commission of the European Communities (96/82, 97/82, 98/82, 99/82, 100/82, 101/82, 102/82, 104/82, 105/82, 108/82, 110/82); Bolloré SA and Others v Commission of the European Communities (T-109/02, T-118/02, T-122/02, T-125/02, T-126/02, T-128/02, T-129/02, T-132/02, T-136/02); Akzo Nobel NV and Others v Commission of the European Communities (C-97/08); Aalborg Portland A/S, Irish Cement Ltd, Ciments français SA, Italcementi - Fabbriche Riunite Cemento SpA, Buzzi Unicem SpA and Cementir - Cementerie del Tirreno SpA v Commission of the European Communities (C-204/00 P, C-205/00 P, C-211/00 P, C-213/00 P, C-217/00 P, C-219/00 P); Evonik Degussa GmbH v Commission of the European Communities and the Council of the European Union (C-266/06); SGL Carbon AG v Commission of the European Communities (C-308/04)