Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Romana Tabacchi Srl v European Commission (T-11/06)
Judgment
Law
7. The Court’s exercise of its unlimit…
285

Romana Tabacchi Srl v European Commission (T-11/06)

law://eu/cjeu/2006/t-11-06/para_285@2026-11-12

Key facts

Court: General Court · Third Chamber
Case: T-11/06 · ECLI:EU:T:2011:560
Decided: 5 Oct 2011
Procedure: Action for annulment
Applicant: Romana Tabacchi Srl
Defendant: European Commission
Rapporteur: E. Cremona
Bench: 3 judges
J. Azizi, E. Cremona, S. Frimodt Nielsen
Language: Italian
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62006TJ0011

Topics

Agreements, decisions and concerted practices

History · 1 version

5 Oct 2011Reading

Judgment of 5 Oct 2011

285In the present case, a fine of EUR 1 million constitutes a fair penalty for the applicant’s conduct.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Connections

Cited by 24: Intel Corporation Inc. v European Commission (T-1129/23); UBS Group AG and Others v European Commission (T-441/21)2 provisions; Crédit agricole SA and Others v European Commission (T-386/21); Clariant AG and Clariant International AG v European Commission (T-590/20); Compagnie industrielle de la matière végétale (CIMV) v European Commission (T-26/22); Google LLC and Alphabet, Inc. v European Commission (T-604/18); Google LLC, formerly Google Inc. and Alphabet, Inc. v European Commission (T-612/17); Rubycon Corp. and Rubycon Holdings Co. Ltd v European Commission (T-344/18); Altice Europe NV v European Commission (T-425/18); Lietuvos geležinkeliai AB v European Commission (T-814/17); CCPL - Consorzio Cooperative di Produzione e Lavoro SC and Others v European Commission (T-522/15); Amador Rodriguez Prieto v European Commission (T-61/18); Pometon SpA v European Commission (T-433/16); Teva UK Ltd and Others v European Commission (T-679/14); Niche Generics Ltd v European Commission (T-701/14); Unichem Laboratories Ltd v European Commission (T-705/14); Mylan Laboratories Ltd and Mylan, Inc. v European Commission (T-682/14); Stührk Delikatessen Import GmbH & Co. KG v European Commission (T-58/14); Marine Harvest ASA v European Commission (T-704/14); Koninklijke Philips NV and Philips France v European Commission (T-762/14); Leone La Ferla SpA v European Commission and European Chemicals Agency (T-392/13); Crosfield Italia Srl v European Chemicals Agency (T-587/14); Goldfish BV and Others v European Commission (T-54/14); UTi Worldwide, Inc. and Others v European Commission (T-264/12)
Cites 23: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)3 provisions; Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (consolidated 2016); Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 of 16 December 2002 on the implementation of the rules on competition laid down in Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty (Text with EEA relevance); Limburgse Vinyl Maatschappij NV (LVM), DSM NV and DSM Kunststoffen BV, Montedison SpA, Elf Atochem SA, Degussa AG, Enichem SpA, Wacker-Chemie GmbH and Hoechst AG and Imperial Chemical Industries plc (ICI) v Commission of the European Communities (C-238/99 P, C-244/99 P, C-245/99 P, C-247/99 P, C-250/99 P, C-251/99 P, C-252/99 P, C-254/99 P); NV Nederlandsche Banden Industrie Michelin v Commission of the European Communities (322/81); SA Musique Diffusion française and others v Commission of the European Communities (100/80, 101/80, 102/80, 103/80); Baustahlgewebe GmbH v Commission of the European Communities (C-185/95 P); Archer Daniels Midland Co. and Archer Daniels Midland Ingredients Ltd v Commission of the European Communities (C-397/03); SGL Carbon AG v Commission of the European Communities (C-308/04); Lafarge SA v European Commission (C-413/08 P); Schunk GmbH and Schunk Kohlenstoff-Technik GmbH v Commission of the European Communities (T-69/04); Raiffeisen Zentralbank Österreich AG and Others v Commission of the European Communities (T-259/02, T-260/02, T-261/02, T-262/02, T-263/02, T-264/02, T-271/02); Groupe Danone v Commission of the European Communities (T-38/02); United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland v Commission of the European Communities (C-180/96); William Prym GmbH & Co. KG and Prym Consumer GmbH & Co. KG v Commission of the European Communities (C-534/07); Thyssen Stahl AG v Commission of the European Communities (C-194/99 P); Jungbunzlauer AG v Commission of the European Communities (T-43/02); Erste Group Bank AG, Raiffeisen Zentralbank Österreich AG, Bank Austria Creditanstalt AG and Österreichische Volksbanken AG v Commission of the European Communities (C-125/07); Hüls AG v Commission of the European Communities (C-199/92 P); Dansk Rørindustri A/S, Isoplus Fernwärmetechnik Vertriebsgesellschaft mbH and Others, KE KELIT Kunststoffwerk GmbH, LR af 1998 A/S, Brugg Rohrsysteme GmbH, LR af 1998 (Deutschland) GmbH and ABB Asea Brown Boveri Ltd v Commission of the European Communities (C-189/02 P, C-202/02 P, C-205/02 P, C-206/02 P, C-207/02 P, C-208/02 P, C-213/02 P); The Queen v Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food and Secretary of State for Health, ex parte: Fedesa and others (C-331/88); Sumitomo Metal Industries Ltd and Nippon Steel Corp. v Commission of the European Communities (C-403/04 P, C-405/04 P); Aalborg Portland A/S, Irish Cement Ltd, Ciments français SA, Italcementi - Fabbriche Riunite Cemento SpA, Buzzi Unicem SpA and Cementir - Cementerie del Tirreno SpA v Commission of the European Communities (C-204/00 P, C-205/00 P, C-211/00 P, C-213/00 P, C-217/00 P, C-219/00 P)