Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Erika Waltraud Ilse Hollmann v Fazenda Pública (C-443/06)
Judgment
The question referred
The principles and freedoms applicable
29

Erika Waltraud Ilse Hollmann v Fazenda Pública (C-443/06)

Judgment of 11 Oct 2007law://eu/cjeu/2006/c-443-06/para_29@2026-11-11

29The Treaty lays down in Article 56 EC, in particular, a specific rule of nondiscrimination in relation to the free movement of capital (Case C-222/04 Cassa di Risparmio di Firenze [2006] ECR I-289, paragraph 99).

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Fourth Chamber
Case: C-443/06 · ECLI:EU:C:2007:600
Decided: 11 Oct 2007
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the Supremo Tribunal Administrativo (Portugal)
Applicant: Erika Waltraud Ilse Hollmann
Defendant: Fazenda Publica
Rapporteur: G. Arestis
Advocate General: P. Mengozzi
Bench: 5 judges
K. Lenaerts, G. Arestis, R. Silva de Lapuerta, J. Malenovský, T. von Danwitz
Language: Portuguese
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62006CJ0443

Topics

Freedom of movement for workers Non-discrimination on grounds of nationality

History · 1 version

11 Oct 2007Reading

Connections

Interprets 1: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)2 provisions
Cited by 10: Hans-Dieter Jundt and Hedwig Jundt v Finanzamt Offenburg (C-281/06)2 provisions; MK v Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira (C-388/19)8 provisions; Ulrich Schröder v Finanzamt Hameln (C-450/09)2 provisions; Marc Michel Josemans v Burgemeester van Maastricht (C-137/09); European Commission v Portuguese Republic (C-105/08); Société de Gestion Industrielle (SGI) v Belgian State (C-311/08); Commission of the European Communities v Federal Republic of Germany (C-269/07); Heinrich Bauer Verlag BeteiligungsGmbH v Finanzamt für Großunternehmen in Hamburg (C-360/06); Lammers & Van Cleeff NV v Belgische Staat (C-105/07); Theodor Jäger v Finanzamt Kusel-Landstuhl (C-256/06)
Cites 16: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)7 provisions; Criminal proceedings against Massimiliano Placanica, Christian Palazzese and Angelo Sorricchio (C-338/04, C-359/04, C-360/04); Winfried L. Holböck v Finanzamt Salzburg-Land (C-157/05); Ministero dell'Economia e delle Finanze v Cassa di Risparmio di Firenze SpA, Fondazione Cassa di Risparmio di San Miniato and Cassa di Risparmio di San Miniato SpA (C-222/04); Asociación Nacional de Empresas Forestales (Asemfo) v Transformación Agraria SA (Tragsa) and Administración del Estado (C-295/05); Metallgesellschaft Ltd and Others, Hoechst AG and Hoechst (UK) Ltd v Commissioners of Inland Revenue and HM Attorney General (C-397/98, C-410/98); Centro di Musicologia Walter Stauffer v Finanzamt München für Körperschaften (C-386/04); Petri Manninen (C-319/02); Försäkringsaktiebolaget Skandia (publ) and Ola Ramstedt v Riksskatteverket (C-422/01); Finanzamt Offenbach am Main-Land v Keller Holding GmbH (C-471/04); Margaretha Bouanich v Skatteverket (C-265/04); J. E. J. Blanckaert v Inspecteur van de Belastingdienst/Particulieren/Ondernemingen buitenland te Heerlen (C-512/03); Rewe Zentralfinanz eG v Finanzamt Köln-Mitte (C-347/04); Commission of the European Communities v Portuguese Republic (C-345/05); Manfred Trummer and Peter Mayer (C-222/97); A.G.M.-COS.MET Srl v Suomen valtio and Tarmo Lehtinen (C-470/03)