Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Groupe Danone v Commission of the European Communities (C-3/06 P)
Judgment
The appeal
Fourth plea, alleging misuse of judici…
Second part of the plea, alleging that…
Findings of the Court
62

Groupe Danone v Commission of the European Communities (C-3/06 P)

Judgment of 8 Feb 2007law://eu/cjeu/2006/c-3-06/para_62@2026-11-10

62It follows that the Community judicature is empowered to exercise its unlimited jurisdiction where the question of the amount of the fine is before it and that that jurisdiction may be exercised to reduce that amount as well as to increase it.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Second Chamber
Case: C-3/06 P · ECLI:EU:C:2007:88
Decided: 8 Feb 2007
Procedure: Action for annulment
Applicant: Groupe Danone
Defendant: Commission of the European Communities
Rapporteur: R. Silva de Lapuerta
Advocate General: M. Poiares Maduro
Bench: 5 judges
C.W.A. Timmermans, J. Klučka, R. Silva de Lapuerta, J. Makarczyk, L. Bay Larsen
Language: French
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62006CJ0003

Topics

Agreements, decisions and concerted practices

History · 1 version

8 Feb 2007Reading

Connections

Cited by 23: Global Steel Wire, SA and Others v European Commission (C-457/16); HSBC Holdings plc and Others v European Commission (T-561/21); Qualcomm, Inc. v European Commission (T-671/19); Chemours Netherlands BV v European Chemicals Agency (C-293/22); Clariant AG and Clariant International AG v European Commission (T-590/20); Google LLC and Alphabet, Inc. v European Commission (T-604/18); SAS Cargo Group A/S and Others v European Commission (T-324/17); Google LLC, formerly Google Inc. and Alphabet, Inc. v European Commission (T-612/17); Nec Corp. v European Commission (T-341/18); Bank Refah Kargaran v Council of the European Union (C-134/19 P); Orange Polska SA v European Commission (C-123/16 P); Dr. K. Chrysostomides & Co. LLC and Others v Council of the European Union and Others (T-680/13); Eleni Pavlikka Bourdouvali and Others v Council of the European Union and Others (T-786/14); Gifi Diffusion v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-424/16); Deutsche Bahn AG and Others v European Commission (C-264/16); Kingdom of Spain v Council of the European Union (C-521/15); Tayto Group Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-287/15); European Commission v Total SA and Elf Aquitaine SA (C-351/15 P); Ori Martin SA and Siderurgica Latina Martin SpA (SLM) v European Commission (C-490/15); Gugler France v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (T-674/13); Galp Energía España SA and Others v European Commission (C-603/13 P)2 provisions; Orange Polska S.A., formerly Telekomunikacja Polska S.A. v European Commission (T-486/11)2 provisions; Koninklijke Philips Electronics NV v European Commission (T-92/13)
Cites 17: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)4 provisions; Limburgse Vinyl Maatschappij NV (LVM), DSM NV and DSM Kunststoffen BV, Montedison SpA, Elf Atochem SA, Degussa AG, Enichem SpA, Wacker-Chemie GmbH and Hoechst AG and Imperial Chemical Industries plc (ICI) v Commission of the European Communities (C-238/99 P, C-244/99 P, C-245/99 P, C-247/99 P, C-250/99 P, C-251/99 P, C-252/99 P, C-254/99 P); Nederlandse Federatieve Vereniging voor de Groothandel op Elektrotechnisch Gebied v Commission of the European Communities (C-105/04 P); Pascual Juan Cubero Vermurie v Commission of the European Communities (C-446/00 P); EEC Council: Regulation No 17: First Regulation implementing Articles 85 and 86 of the Treaty; JCB Service v Commission of the European Communities (C-167/04 P); Vereniging van Samenwerkende Prijsregelende Organisaties in de Bouwnijverheid and others v Commission of the European Communities (C-137/95); Ferriere Nord SpA v Commission of the European Communities (C-219/95 P); Regina v Kent Kirk (C-63/83); Somaco SARL v Commission of the European Communities (C-401/96 P); 2003/569/EC: Commission Decision of 5 December 2001 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 of the EC Treaty (Case IV/37.614/F3 PO/Interbrew and Alken-Maes) (notified under document number C(2001) 3915); Dansk Rørindustri A/S, Isoplus Fernwärmetechnik Vertriebsgesellschaft mbH and Others, KE KELIT Kunststoffwerk GmbH, LR af 1998 A/S, Brugg Rohrsysteme GmbH, LR af 1998 (Deutschland) GmbH and ABB Asea Brown Boveri Ltd v Commission of the European Communities (C-189/02 P, C-202/02 P, C-205/02 P, C-206/02 P, C-207/02 P, C-208/02 P, C-213/02 P); Aalborg Portland A/S, Irish Cement Ltd, Ciments français SA, Italcementi - Fabbriche Riunite Cemento SpA, Buzzi Unicem SpA and Cementir - Cementerie del Tirreno SpA v Commission of the European Communities (C-204/00 P, C-205/00 P, C-211/00 P, C-213/00 P, C-217/00 P, C-219/00 P); Baustahlgewebe GmbH v Commission of the European Communities (C-185/95 P); SGL Carbon AG v Commission of the European Communities (C-308/04); Groupe Danone v Commission of the European Communities (T-38/02); Thyssen Stahl AG v Commission of the European Communities (C-194/99 P)