Judgment_paragraph 45 · Il Ponte Finanziaria SpA v European Union Intellectual Property Office (C-234/06 P)

45The argument put forward by the appellant does not meet those requirements. In fact, it does not contain any legal argument to demonstrate the manner in which the Court of First Instance allegedly erred in law. The appellant does no more than reproduce the plea which it invoked before the Court of First Instance, without furnishing any further clarification and without identifying clearly the elements of the judgment under appeal that it wishes to challenge.