Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Roderich Weißenfels v European Parliament (C-135/06 P)
Judgment
The appeal
The right of the person concerned to r…
Arguments of the parties
84

Roderich Weißenfels v European Parliament (C-135/06 P)

Judgment of 18 Dec 2007law://eu/cjeu/2006/c-135-06/para_84@2026-11-11

84It refers finally to the judgment in Case T-117/89 Sens v Commission [1990] ECR II-185), to maintain that the fact that the beneficiaries of the two benefits in question are not identical does not constitute a relevant criterion for applying Article 67(2) of the Staff Regulations.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Second Chamber
Case: C-135/06 P · ECLI:EU:C:2007:812
Decided: 18 Dec 2007
Procedure: staff cases successful
Ruled invalid: 62004TJ0033
Applicant: Roderich Weißenfels
Defendant: European Parliament
Rapporteur: J.-C. Bonichot
Advocate General: J. Kokott
Bench: 5 judges
C.W.A. Timmermans, L. Bay Larsen, K. Schiemann, P. Kūris, J.-C. Bonichot
Language: German
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62006CJ0135

Topics

Staff Regulations of Officials

History · 1 version

18 Dec 2007Reading

Connections

Interprets 1: Roderich Weißenfels v European Parliament (T-33/04)
Cited by 24: AH v European Commission (T-1093/23); VO v European Commission (T-160/23); ZR v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-634/22); PV v European Commission (T-89/20); Vasile Dumitrescu and Others v European Commission and Court of Justice of the European Union (C-567/22 P); OP v European Parliament (T-143/22); AL v European Commission (T-714/21); SV v European Investment Bank (T-311/21); LR v European Investment Bank (T-529/20); WV v European External Action Service (C-162/20 P); KL v European Investment Bank (T-370/20); KR v European Commission (T-408/20); FI v European Commission (T-694/19); Guy Steifer v European Economic and Social Committee (T-331/17); Alberto Spagnolli and Others v European Commission (T-568/16, T-599/16); Systema Teknolotzis AE - Efarmogon Ilektronikis kai Pliroforikis v European Commission (T-234/15); Dimosia Epicheirisi Ilektrismou AE (DEI) v European Commission (C-228/16 P); CP v European Parliament (F-98/15); Livio Missir Mamachi di Lusignano v European Commission (C-417/14 RX); Westfälische Drahtindustrie GmbH and Others v European Commission (T-393/10)2 provisions; Diana Grazyte v European Commission (F-76/11); Kostantinos Giannakouris v European Commission (F-83/10); Efstratios Chatzidoukakis v European Commission (F-84/10); Harald Mische v European Commission (F-70/05)
Cites 10: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016); Laboratoires pharmaceutiques Bergaderm SA and Jean-Jacques Goupil v Commission of the European Communities (C-352/98 P); Henri Maurissen and Union syndicale - Bruxelles v Court of Auditors of the European Union (193/87, 194/87); Fabrique de fer de Charleroi SA and Dillinger Hüttenwerke AG v Commission of the European Communities (351/85, 360/85); Jean Lestelle v European Commission (C-30/91 P); Regulation (EEC, Euratom, ECSC) No 259/68 of the Council of 29 February 1968 laying down the Staff Regulations of Officials and the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Communities and instituting special measures temporarily applicable to officials of the Commission (Staff Regulations of Officials); Francine Gelders-Deboeck v European Commission (C-106/76, C-14/77); Paul Sens v European Commission (T-117/89); Roderich Weißenfels v European Parliament (T-33/04); European Investment Bank v Michel Hautem (C-449/99 P)