Judgment_paragraph 36 · Isabel Clara Centeno Mediavilla and Others v European Commission (T-58/05)

36That interpretation is dictated both by the wording of the provision in question and by the role assumed by the Staff Regulations Committee. First, by providing for consultation without reservation or exception on any proposal for revision of the Staff Regulations, that provision attaches a wide scope to the obligation laid down by it. Its terms are therefore manifestly irreconcilable with a narrow interpretation of its scope. Second, the Staff Regulations Committee, as a joint body composed both of representatives of the administrative authorities and of democratically elected representatives of the staff of all the institutions, is called upon to take into consideration and express the interests of the Community civil service as a whole (Case T-164/97 Busacca and Others v Court of Auditors [1998] ECR-SC I-A-565 and II-1699, paragraphs 91 to 95).

Isabel Clara Centeno Mediavilla and Others v European Commission (T-58/05)

Key facts

History · 1 version

Connections