Judgment_paragraph 32 · Bang & Olufsen A/S v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-460/05)

32However, the level of attention of the relevant public is likely to vary according to the category of goods or services in question (Case C-342/97 Lloyd Schuhfabrik Meyer [1999] ECR I-3819, paragraph 26, and Case T-305/02 Nestlé Waters France v OHIM (Shape of a bottle) [2003] ECR II-5207, paragraph 34).

Bang & Olufsen A/S v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-460/05)

Key facts

History · 1 version

Connections