Judgment_paragraph 49 · Société anonyme des eaux minérales d'Évian (SAEME) v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (T-407/05)

49Indeed, the established case-law shows that there is continuity, in terms of their functions, between the different departments of OHIM, namely the examiner, the Opposition Division, the Administration of Trade Marks and Legal Divisions and the Cancellation Divisions, on the one hand, and the Boards of Appeal, on the other (Case T-308/01 Henkel v OHIM — LHS (UK) (KLEENCARE) [2003] ECR II-3253, paragraph 25; Case T-323/03 La Baronia de Turis v OHIM — Baron Philippe de Rothschild (LA BARONNIE) [2006] ECR II-2085, paragraph 57; and Case T-252/04 Caviar Anzali v OHIM — Novomarket (Asetra) [2006] ECR II-2115, paragraph 30).