Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Agroexpansión, SA v European Commission (T-38/05)
Judgment
Procedure and forms of order sought
71

Agroexpansión, SA v European Commission (T-38/05)

Judgment of 12 Oct 2011law://eu/cjeu/2005/t-38-05/para_71@2026-11-11

71On 28 January 2005, Dimon brought an action for annulment in part of the contested decision or, alternatively, for a reduction of the fine imposed on it by the contested decision (Case T-41/05).

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: General Court · Fourth Chamber
Case: T-38/05 · ECLI:EU:T:2011:585
Decided: 12 Oct 2011
Procedure: Action for annulment
Applicant: Agroexpansión, SA
Defendant: European Commission
Rapporteur: K. O’Higgins
Bench: 3 judges
O. Czúcz, I. Labucka, K. O’Higgins
Language: Spanish
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62005TJ0038

Topics

Agreements, decisions and concerted practices

History · 1 version

12 Oct 2011Reading

Connections

Cited by 4: Alliance One International Inc. v European Commission (C-668/11); Alliance One International, Inc (formerly Dimon, Inc.) v European Commission (C-679/11); Alliance One International, Inc. v European Commission (T-41/05)3 provisions; Alliance One International, Inc., formerly Standard Commercial Corp. and Others v European Commission (T-24/05)
Cites 24: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)2 provisions; Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 of 16 December 2002 on the implementation of the rules on competition laid down in Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty (Text with EEA relevance); Confederación Española de Empresarios de Estaciones de Servicio v Compañía Española de Petróleos SA (C-217/05); Dalmine SpA v Commission of the European Communities (C-407/04 P); Imperial Chemical Industries Ltd. v Commission of the European Communities (48/69); Aalborg Portland A/S, Irish Cement Ltd, Ciments français SA, Italcementi - Fabbriche Riunite Cemento SpA, Buzzi Unicem SpA and Cementir - Cementerie del Tirreno SpA v Commission of the European Communities (C-204/00 P, C-205/00 P, C-211/00 P, C-213/00 P, C-217/00 P, C-219/00 P); NV Nederlandsche Banden Industrie Michelin v Commission of the European Communities (322/81); Europemballage Corporation and Continental Can Company Inc. v Commission of the European Communities (6/72); Dalmine SpA v Commission of the European Communities (T-50/00); SA Musique Diffusion française and others v Commission of the European Communities (100/80, 101/80, 102/80, 103/80); Corsica Ferries France SAS v Commission of the European Communities (T-349/03); Stora Kopparbergs Bergslags AB v Commission of the European Communities (C-286/98 P); Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato v Ente tabacchi italiani - ETI SpA and Others and Philip Morris Products SA and Others v Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato and Others (C-280/06); J. R. Geigy AG v Commission of the European Communities (52/69); Schunk GmbH and Schunk Kohlenstoff-Technik GmbH v Commission of the European Communities (T-69/04); Archer Daniels Midland Company and Archer Daniels Midland Ingredients Ltd v Commission of the European Communities (T-224/00); Raiffeisen Zentralbank Österreich AG and Others v Commission of the European Communities (T-259/02, T-260/02, T-261/02, T-262/02, T-263/02, T-264/02, T-271/02); Hoek Loos NV v Commission of the European Communities (T-304/02); Showa Denko KK v Commission of the European Communities (C-289/04); Cascades SA v Commission of the European Communities (C-279/98 P); Britannia Alloys & Chemicals Ltd v Commission of the European Communities (C-76/06 P); Dansk Rørindustri A/S, Isoplus Fernwärmetechnik Vertriebsgesellschaft mbH and Others, KE KELIT Kunststoffwerk GmbH, LR af 1998 A/S, Brugg Rohrsysteme GmbH, LR af 1998 (Deutschland) GmbH and ABB Asea Brown Boveri Ltd v Commission of the European Communities (C-189/02 P, C-202/02 P, C-205/02 P, C-206/02 P, C-207/02 P, C-208/02 P, C-213/02 P); Commission of the European Communities v Chambre syndicale nationale des entreprises de transport de fonds et valeurs (Sytraval) and Brink's France SARL (C-367/95 P); Limburgse Vinyl Maatschappij NV, Elf Atochem SA, BASF AG, Shell International Chemical Company Ltd, DSM NV, DSM Kunststoffen BV, Wacker-Chemie GmbH, Hoechst AG, Société artésienne de vinyle, Montedison SpA, Imperial Chemical Industries plc, Hüls AG and Enichem SpA v Commission of the European Communities (T-305/94, T-306/94, T-307/94, T-313/94, T-314/94, T-315/94, T-316/94, T-318/94, T-325/94, T-328/94, T-329/94, T-335/94)